1992
DOI: 10.1021/ic00034a005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electronic absorption and resonance Raman spectra of tricarbonyl(p-tolyl-1,4-diaza-1,3-butadiene)halorhenium. Evidence for a lowest ligand to ligand charge-transfer (LLCT) transition

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
16
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…a(C-Re) to phen. Similar LLCT electronic transitions placed at higher energies have been identified in other fac-Re(l) tricarbonyl complexes [15][16][17][18]. Since the chromophores in (C) are dicarbonyl complexes, the ionization potential of the LUMO, a a(C-Re) orbital, and therefore the energy of the ligand to ligand charge transfer transition could be smaller than in the tricarbonyl complexes.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 53%
“…a(C-Re) to phen. Similar LLCT electronic transitions placed at higher energies have been identified in other fac-Re(l) tricarbonyl complexes [15][16][17][18]. Since the chromophores in (C) are dicarbonyl complexes, the ionization potential of the LUMO, a a(C-Re) orbital, and therefore the energy of the ligand to ligand charge transfer transition could be smaller than in the tricarbonyl complexes.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 53%
“…Another possible explanation for the significant differences in the excited state lifetimes would be if the ancillary ligand altered the type of excited state populated. ,,, Vlček and co-workers have shown that ancillary ligand variation, where L = Cl – , Br – and I – can alter the nature of the lowest lying emitting state, changing from MLCT to XLCT upon progressing from Cl – to I – . This increase in halide character was accompanied by an increase of the lifetime. However, in the case of the [Re­(L)­(CO) 3 (phen-TPA)] n + complexes, interpretation of the dynamic data does not require inclusion of an XLCT state specifically, due to the distinct similarity between the vibrational spectra of all four complexes.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…45,46 Another possible explanation for the significant differences in the excited state lifetimes would be if the ancillary ligand altered the type of excited state populated. 6,12,47,48 Vlcěk and coworkers have shown that ancillary ligand variation, where L = Cl − , Br − and I − can alter the nature of the lowest lying emitting state, changing from MLCT to XLCT upon progressing from Cl − to I − . 5−7 This increase in halide character was accompanied by an increase of the lifetime.…”
Section: ■ Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to illustrate the presence of such correlations, we start by scrutinizing the excited states of the complex [Re(Cl)(CO) 3 (bipy)] (bipy=2,2'-bipyridine); this rhenium carbonyl diimine complex will be more thoroughly examined later in section 4.5. For now, it is su cient to mention that the excited-state characters of this and related complexes are discussed in the literature due to the strong mixing between Re→L and (CO) 3 →L excitations [29,57], and in the case of halogeno-complexes also X→L, with X being the halogen and L the diimine ligand (e.g., bipy) [119,120]. This strong mixing is clearly appreciated in Figure 8, which displays charge transfer numbers for the rst 20 singlets and rst 20 triplets of [Re(Cl)(CO) 3 (bipy)].…”
Section: Correlations Between Charge Transfer Numbersmentioning
confidence: 99%