2007
DOI: 10.1109/led.2007.891795
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electron Transport in Strained-Silicon Directly on Insulator Ultrathin-Body n-MOSFETs With Body Thickness Ranging From 2 to 25 nm

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
40
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
40
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Together with the possibility of large-scale liquid-based processing of MoS 2 and related 2D materials, 17 our finding could open the way to using MoS 2 for applications in flexible electronics. Single-layer MoS 2 also has advantages over conventional silicon: it is thinner than state-of-the-art silicon films that are 2 nm thick 36 and has a smaller dielectric constant (ε = 7, ref 37) than silicon (ε = 11.9), implying that using single-layer MoS 2 could reduce short channel effects 26 and result in smaller and less powerhungry transistors than those based on silicon technology. Several difficulties however need to be solved before MoS 2 can become a mainstream electronic material for the semiconductor industry.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Together with the possibility of large-scale liquid-based processing of MoS 2 and related 2D materials, 17 our finding could open the way to using MoS 2 for applications in flexible electronics. Single-layer MoS 2 also has advantages over conventional silicon: it is thinner than state-of-the-art silicon films that are 2 nm thick 36 and has a smaller dielectric constant (ε = 7, ref 37) than silicon (ε = 11.9), implying that using single-layer MoS 2 could reduce short channel effects 26 and result in smaller and less powerhungry transistors than those based on silicon technology. Several difficulties however need to be solved before MoS 2 can become a mainstream electronic material for the semiconductor industry.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In such a ultrasmall thickness regime, the varying rate of mobility of 2D MoS 2 is relatively weaker than that of silicon, in which an extremely strong power-law (μ ~ t -6 ) dependence on channel thickness (t) dominates as t < 4 nm owing to the carrier scattering from surface roughness (SR). (15)(16)(17) Given the atomically sharp surfaces shown by the 2D MoS 2 , the SR scattering mechanism is obviously not the origin of the mobility degradation observed in the ultrathin 2D chalcogenides. The intriguing thickness dependence and performance degradation remain to be elucidated.…”
Section: Dependence Of Performance On Thicknessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fourth, the atomic flatness makes them immune to surface-roughness-induced carrier scattering so that they can overcome the limitation of channel thickness confronted by Si FETs. (15)(16)(17) Extensive research attention has been devoted to 2D chalcogenides spanning from synthesis (18)(19)(20)(21)(22)(23)(24) and characterization (25,26) to electrical, (27)(28)(29)(30)(31)(32)(33) optoelectronic (34)(35)(36) and photovoltaic (37)(38)(39)(40)(41) applications, and further to novel valley physics (42)(43)(44)(45)(46)(47)(48) and nonlinear optics. (49,50) At present, reviews of various topics are available.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the operation of Si-MOSFET with an atomic scale thickness is not realistic because the mobility is drastically reduced because of fabrication damage. 5,6 The advantage of 2D materials is their intrinsic atomic thickness, 7,8 which allows both the reduction of the short channel effect and …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the operation of Si-MOSFET with an atomic scale thickness is not realistic because the mobility is drastically reduced because of fabrication damage. 5,6 The advantage of 2D materials is their intrinsic atomic thickness, 7,8 which allows both the reduction of the short channel effect and the possible retention of high mobility. For the short channel devices in which quasiballistic transport is assumed, the on-current can be determined not by the mobility but by the effective mass.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%