1959
DOI: 10.1103/physrev.114.1219
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electron Spin Resonance Experiments on Donors in Silicon. I. Electronic Structure of Donors by the Electron Nuclear Double Resonance Technique

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

36
551
1
6

Year Published

1997
1997
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,002 publications
(594 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
36
551
1
6
Order By: Relevance
“…For natural silicon (nuclear spin fraction f = 0.0467) our calculated root mean square line-width is equal to 0.89 G. On the other hand, a simple spin resonance scan leads to 2.5 G/2 √ 2 ln 2 = 1.06 G [33]. Therefore the simple model employed here is able to explain 84% of the experimental hyperfine line-width.…”
Section: Effective Mass Model For a Phosphorus Impurity In Siliconmentioning
confidence: 64%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For natural silicon (nuclear spin fraction f = 0.0467) our calculated root mean square line-width is equal to 0.89 G. On the other hand, a simple spin resonance scan leads to 2.5 G/2 √ 2 ln 2 = 1.06 G [33]. Therefore the simple model employed here is able to explain 84% of the experimental hyperfine line-width.…”
Section: Effective Mass Model For a Phosphorus Impurity In Siliconmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…Here n = (0.029eV /E i ) 1/2 with E i being the ionization energy of the impurity (E i = 0.044 eV for the phosphorus impurity, hence n = 0.81 in our case), a Si = 5.43Å the lattice parameter for Si, a = 25.09Å and b = 14.43Å characteristic lengths for Si hydrogenic impurities [33]. Moreover, we will use experimentally measured values for the charge density on each Si lattice site |u(R i )| 2 = η ≈ 186 [32].…”
Section: Effective Mass Model For a Phosphorus Impurity In Siliconmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The theoretical maximum of T 2 , in the complete absence of the unwanted interactions with other paramagnetic impurities, is the relaxation time T 1 . Indeed, for the case of Phosphorus defects in isotopically ultra-pure 28 Si, the phase relaxation time of the loosely bound Phosphorus electrons can be as long as T 2 > .1 msec with T 1 > 1 hour [19]. There T 2 is limited by Hyperfine interactions with residual 29 Si nuceli [20].…”
Section: Group V Endohedralsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The two features indicated by dashed lines have equal amplitudes, are separated by 4.2 mT and correspond to a central g-value of 1.9985. This is the characteristic ESR hyperfine signature of the 31 P donor electron in silicon [24,25]. The broader peak at B 0 = 347.1 mT is an unresolved superposition of signal contributions from P b0 centers that have different orientations with respect to the Si (100) surface, which results in resonances at g = 2.0039 and g = 2.0081 for the orientation of the sample with respect to the magnetic field orientation indicated in Fig.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%