1969
DOI: 10.1177/00220345690480010501
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electron Probe Microanalysis of Noncarious Enamel and Dentin and Calcified Tissues in Mottled Teeth

Abstract: A quantitative chemical distribution of five elements in several undecalcified sections of teeth was determined by the electron microprobe method. The calcium (Ca)! phosphorus (P) weight percent ratios were determined in scans through the enamel and dentin, and characteristic curves for the concentration of the trace elements magnesium (Mg), sodium (Na), and chlorine (Cl) were obtained.The electron microprobe permits the qualitative and quantitative analysis of elements in a continuing or spot scan of an extre… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

1971
1971
1985
1985

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Quantitatively, the experimental values of 37.9 and 36.8 wt %> Ca in bovine and human enamel, respectively, concur strongly with the value 37.5 wt % > reported by Besic et al [1969] and Frank et al [1966].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Quantitatively, the experimental values of 37.9 and 36.8 wt %> Ca in bovine and human enamel, respectively, concur strongly with the value 37.5 wt % > reported by Besic et al [1969] and Frank et al [1966].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 87%
“…One which can easily be taken into account is CI-for OH- (LeGeros, 1974). CI-is typically present to the extent of 0.3 wt % (Besic, Knowles, Wieman and Keller, 1969). By Vegard's law and the fact that for chlorapatite a = 9.644 ~, the presence of this much Cl-on the hexad axis would call for -0.01 expansion.…”
Section: Co2(in) + 2(oh-) (Structural) +-~ Co 3 (Structural) + H20 (Out)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Na and Mg content of outer enamel is smaller than that of body enamel [Brudevold et al, 1960;Shaw and Yen, 1982;Robinson et al, 1981;Besic et al, 1969;Frostell et al, 1977]. However, the gradients reported up to now do not suggest that the Na and Mg content of the outer layer of tooth enamel is virtually zero.…”
mentioning
confidence: 91%