1969
DOI: 10.1109/tns.1969.4325443
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electron Positron Storage Rings: Status and Present Limitations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
1

Year Published

1971
1971
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
5
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It was soon clear that collective instabilities were playing a major role, in fact limiting initially the stored current to about 100 µA, against the 100 mA of the design. The situation was well summarized by Amman in a paper presented at the 1969 Particle Accelerator conference [43]: It may seem strange that eight years after the initial operation of a storage ring, only one e − e − (the Princeton-Stanford 550 MeV) and two e + e − rings, VEPP-II and ACO, have produced high energy physics results, and these are limited to experiments with very high cross section I would like to remark that the first beam instabilities observed on the Princeton-Stanford e − e − ring, and interpreted as being due to the resistance of the walls, opened a new era in the accelerator field: it has been realized for the first time that the interaction of the beam with its environment makes a circular accelerator an essentially unstable system, that can become stable, in virtue of the Landau damping, when the beam density is not too high and the non linearities in the focusing forces give a frequency distribution of the particles large enough to compete with the instabilities.…”
Section: Vi2 Contributions To Adone Accelerator Physicsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…It was soon clear that collective instabilities were playing a major role, in fact limiting initially the stored current to about 100 µA, against the 100 mA of the design. The situation was well summarized by Amman in a paper presented at the 1969 Particle Accelerator conference [43]: It may seem strange that eight years after the initial operation of a storage ring, only one e − e − (the Princeton-Stanford 550 MeV) and two e + e − rings, VEPP-II and ACO, have produced high energy physics results, and these are limited to experiments with very high cross section I would like to remark that the first beam instabilities observed on the Princeton-Stanford e − e − ring, and interpreted as being due to the resistance of the walls, opened a new era in the accelerator field: it has been realized for the first time that the interaction of the beam with its environment makes a circular accelerator an essentially unstable system, that can become stable, in virtue of the Landau damping, when the beam density is not too high and the non linearities in the focusing forces give a frequency distribution of the particles large enough to compete with the instabilities.…”
Section: Vi2 Contributions To Adone Accelerator Physicsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…16.6, and the high energy physics experiment could start. The paper reporting these results, [11], ended recognizing in the acknowledgements Touschek's contributions to ADONE Fig. 16.6 ADONE Luminosity measurements with the scattering apparatus and three bunches per beam (full curve) at 1 GeV.…”
Section: Reaching Adone Design Luminositymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But when we tried to increase the current to achieve the design current of 100 mA/beam, we encountered many unexpected effects generating sudden beam losses, limiting the current and the luminosity to values well below the design values and what was needed to do meaningful high energy physics experiments. Amman discussed the situation in a paper he presented at 1969 Particle Accelerator Conference [11]. In this paper he summarized our experience with ADONE initial commissioning: "ADONE, after the first year of troubleshooting (talking of a storage ring it would be better to say instability-shooting), should start high energy physics experiments during 1969.…”
Section: Commissioning Adonementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The case of two cavities is considered in this analysis, one the main accelerating cavity and the other the frequencysplitting cavity. The energy gain per turn from these cavities for the synchronous particle in the mth bunch is given by tim=eVI sinkI (+LI+em+ @I) + eV2 sink2 (+L2+&+ 03, (1) where the subscripts one and two refer to the main accelerating and the frequency-splitting cavity respectively, and Ll=nr/kI with n integral. For convenience the phase 81 is chosen so that when V2=0 the position of the synchronous particle in the mth bunch is given by -L Pm=?, m=O, 1,2 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%