1989
DOI: 10.1007/bf01310934
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electron microscopy and antigenic studies of uncharacterized viruses. I. Evidence suggesting the placement of viruses in familiesArenaviridae, Paramyxoviridae, orPoxviridae

Abstract: During approximately 35 years, investigators in various laboratories studying arbovirus ecology and epidemiology accumulated many virus isolates, more than 60 of which were not characterized or placed in taxa. By a combination of electron microscopic and antigenic studies we collected information sufficient to provisionally classify 60 isolates. Electron microscopic observations suggest that 20 are members of the virus family Bunyaviridae, 20 Rhabdoviridae, 14 Reoviridae, one Togaviridae, one Paramyxoviridae (… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
28
0

Year Published

1989
1989
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
(20 reference statements)
4
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…All avian (Pekin duck, Japanese quail) and mammalian (human, African green monkey, rhesus macaque, Mexican free-tailed bat, Virginia opossum, American mink, cattle) cell lines tested were susceptible to infection and supported replication to various degrees (maximum titers of 10 6.15 to 10 8.02 PFU/ml). However, WFBV did not replicate in C6/36 cells derived from Aedes albopictus, similar to results reported for QFRV and JAV (23,64) as well as CyRV (34), demonstrating an in vitro host range barrier for Asian tiger mosquito cells in all tested quaranjaviruses. Phylogenetic analysis.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 68%
“…All avian (Pekin duck, Japanese quail) and mammalian (human, African green monkey, rhesus macaque, Mexican free-tailed bat, Virginia opossum, American mink, cattle) cell lines tested were susceptible to infection and supported replication to various degrees (maximum titers of 10 6.15 to 10 8.02 PFU/ml). However, WFBV did not replicate in C6/36 cells derived from Aedes albopictus, similar to results reported for QFRV and JAV (23,64) as well as CyRV (34), demonstrating an in vitro host range barrier for Asian tiger mosquito cells in all tested quaranjaviruses. Phylogenetic analysis.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 68%
“…The measurements of the viral nucleocapsid (approximately 1 gm long and 17.5 nm diameter) and virion particles (diameter approximately 250 nm) corresponded well with those of other paramyxoviruses (Kingsbury et al, 1974) and extended the findings of Zeller et al (1989). These data indicate that the ribonucleoprotein and probably the genome of Mapuera virus are similar in length to those of other paramyxoviruses (Galinski & Wechsler, 1991).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 69%
“…The virus was registered in the International Catalogue of Arboviruses in 1982(Karabatsos, 1985 where it was unclassified but noted as probably not an arbovirus. A preliminary characterization of Mapuera virus by Zeller et al (1989) using electron microscopy suggested that the virus belonged to the Paramyxoviridae family, on the basis of its morphology and its ability to haemagglutinate guinea-pig erythrocytes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although there was an indication that this virus had transmitted to humans (10% of human sera tested were positive in hemagglutination inhibition tests), the possibility of cross-reactivity was not ruled out (6,7). The next paramyxovirus isolated from bats was Mapuera virus, isolated from the microbat frugivore Sturnira lilium in Brazil in 1979 (8). Although Mapuera virus has not been specifically linked to disease outbreaks, its close phylogenetic relationship with porcine rubulavirus (PorPV), which caused epizootic disease in Mexican pigs in the early 1980s (9), led to speculation about its potential for host switching (10).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%