1992
DOI: 10.1080/00268979200101151
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electron localization and delocalization in biselectrophores

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 12 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We turn now to the discussion on spin−spin relaxation T 2 , which is sensitive to fluctuating local fields on a time scale of about the line width (3 kHz in our case at 4.7 T). Figure presents the 1/ T 2 relaxation rate from 300 K down to 5 K. A peak appears in 1/ T 2 around 25 K. In order to model the 1/ T 2 relaxation rate, we apply the following relation: , 1 T 2 = 1 40 Δ ω S 2 true( 3 2 τ 1 + ω 0 2 τ 2 + 4 2 τ 1 + Δ ω S 2 τ 2 true) where Δω S corresponds to CSA fluctuations caused by reorientational process. The slow motion regime is observed when Δω S τ ≫ 1 and the fast motional narrowing case for Δω S τ ≪ 1.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We turn now to the discussion on spin−spin relaxation T 2 , which is sensitive to fluctuating local fields on a time scale of about the line width (3 kHz in our case at 4.7 T). Figure presents the 1/ T 2 relaxation rate from 300 K down to 5 K. A peak appears in 1/ T 2 around 25 K. In order to model the 1/ T 2 relaxation rate, we apply the following relation: , 1 T 2 = 1 40 Δ ω S 2 true( 3 2 τ 1 + ω 0 2 τ 2 + 4 2 τ 1 + Δ ω S 2 τ 2 true) where Δω S corresponds to CSA fluctuations caused by reorientational process. The slow motion regime is observed when Δω S τ ≫ 1 and the fast motional narrowing case for Δω S τ ≪ 1.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%