2008
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-76664-3_2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electron Emission from Surfaces Induced by Slow Ions and Atoms

Abstract: Electron emission from surfaces is of crucial importance in determining the properties of electrical discharges, where it is caused by the impact of ions, atoms, electrons, and photons. At the microscopic level, the physics of electron emission from solid targets is usually described by a three-step model: electron excitation, electron transport to the surface, and its escape through the surface. This division serves a heuristic purpose and it must be borne in mind that, in purely surface events, actually only… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
19
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
1
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The bias current I bias can be regarded as an easy to measure approximate quantity describing the flux of incident ions, which are usually single positive charged. However, besides the actual ion current, I bias also comprises a superimposed current due to the emission of secondary electrons [34]. As is to be expected, the statistical evaluation (Figure 5c) proves that, in the first place, I bias depends on a positive effect of its cause, U bias (B).…”
Section: Bias Currentsupporting
confidence: 62%
“…The bias current I bias can be regarded as an easy to measure approximate quantity describing the flux of incident ions, which are usually single positive charged. However, besides the actual ion current, I bias also comprises a superimposed current due to the emission of secondary electrons [34]. As is to be expected, the statistical evaluation (Figure 5c) proves that, in the first place, I bias depends on a positive effect of its cause, U bias (B).…”
Section: Bias Currentsupporting
confidence: 62%
“…For a potential emission to occur the potential energy (ionization potential) of the projectile has to exceed twice the work function of the target material. A fit to experimentally determined secondary electron emission yield for various ions on clean surfaces is given as 208,209 c SE ¼ 0:032ð0:78E iz À 2/Þ; (15) where E iz is the neutralization energy of the ion and / is the work function of the target surface. The process can only occur if 0.78E iz > 2/.…”
Section: Self-sputteringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The yields of secondary electrons emitted from (clean) metal surfaces from the impact of hydrogen ions with kinetic energies of 2 to 10 keV increase from 0.45 to 1.25 electrons/ion (for molybdenum) [42]. But secondary electron emission is very sensitive to the surface work function (or electron affinity for oxides) and the electronic energy loss of ions (which depends on the target composition) both of which were not measured during our experiments [43]. This could lead to an uncertainty in the ion currents between low and high cathode voltages of up to an estimated factor of two.…”
Section: Neutron Yield Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%