1994
DOI: 10.1116/1.587458
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electron–electron scattering in microcolumns

Abstract: Electron-electron scattering in a double quantum dot: Effective mass approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The simulations allow the inclusion of electron tunneling and electron-electron interactions into the electron emission process. 12 The lines represent theoretical predictions of the energy width from a 0.3 m radius Schottky emitter at three values of tip temperature and angular current densities from 0.1 to 100 A/sr. Electric fields of 0.01 to 0.14 V/Å at 1800 K were applied to obtain the theoretical data.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The simulations allow the inclusion of electron tunneling and electron-electron interactions into the electron emission process. 12 The lines represent theoretical predictions of the energy width from a 0.3 m radius Schottky emitter at three values of tip temperature and angular current densities from 0.1 to 100 A/sr. Electric fields of 0.01 to 0.14 V/Å at 1800 K were applied to obtain the theoretical data.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 It has a larger energy spread when compared to a cold field emitter at a given angular emission current density. 11,12 However, Schottky emitters have a much more stable emission current than the cold field emitters due to the lower electric fields and the larger and more stable emitting areas. 8,13,14 In this article, we present detailed experimental measurements of the energy distributions of the emitted electrons from Schottky emitters as functions of tip temperature and angular emission current density.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It can reduce the device damage and it is possible to irradiate insulating devices without significant surface charging because of the considerably reduced electron penetration into the test samples. [7][8][9][10] The resolution of the miniaturized electron optical system is determined by various factors such as spherical aberration, astigmatism, and coma, and a prelens double deflector was proposed to avoid these excessive aberrations. [4][5][6] The scaled aberration coefficients of miniature columns are particularly suitable for generating higher-resolution beams of low-energy electrons, 2 and the electron optics of an electrostatic microcolumn have been studied intensively.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are several reported results concerning ͑field emit-ted͒ electron focusing, either as a specific issue [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9] or correlated with the FED application. 10,11 Generally speaking, these ͑experimental and theoretical͒ studies refer to Spindt-type 12 emitters provided with one or more supplementary electrodes, appearing either as an aperture ͑above the gate͒ or in the same plane with the gate and concentric with it.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%