1968
DOI: 10.1002/prop.19680160802
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electron Ejection from Solids by Atomic Particles with Kinetic Energy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
10
0
1

Year Published

1974
1974
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 108 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 112 publications
(16 reference statements)
1
10
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We have shown essentially all of the yield data for clean metallic surfaces that we have found for energies below about 1 keV. At higher ion energies, these data are only a sample that available [37][38][39][40][42][43][44]. A short summary of the cleaning procedure is given with the reference.…”
Section: Beam Results For Clean Metalsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…We have shown essentially all of the yield data for clean metallic surfaces that we have found for energies below about 1 keV. At higher ion energies, these data are only a sample that available [37][38][39][40][42][43][44]. A short summary of the cleaning procedure is given with the reference.…”
Section: Beam Results For Clean Metalsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…40 and 73. Due to the lack of available data for the fast-atom emission yield c a ðeÞ on the molybdenum surface, we assumed the ratio c a ðeÞ=c i ðeÞ to be the same as the ratio of secondary yields for a "clean" cathode, for which experimental data 74 are available. The secondary electron yields are plotted in Fig.…”
Section: Secondary Electron Emissionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the Inconel sample behaves as ''dirty'' material having an oxide layer and surface adsorbates, which typically results in a different value of ␥ than surfaces sputter cleaned or deposited in situ under UHV conditions. [35][36][37][38] However, these results can be directly applied to MCP operation since the detector input surface is typically not cleaned in situ before the detector is used. Using this method, the secondary electron yield for 20 keV protons normally incident on Inconel was measured to be 3.6.…”
Section: Secondary Electron Yield Measurementmentioning
confidence: 99%