2014
DOI: 10.1063/1.4858393
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electron-beam-induced current at absorber back surfaces of Cu(In,Ga)Se2 thin-film solar cells

Abstract: The present work reports on investigations of the influence of the microstructure on electronic properties of Cu(In,Ga)Se 2 (CIGSe) thin-film solar cells. For this purpose, ZnO/CdS/CIGSe stacks of these solar cells were lifted off the Mo-coated glass substrates. The exposed CIGSe backsides of these stacks were investigated by means of electron-beam-induced current (EBIC) and cathodoluminescence (CL) measurements as well as by electron backscattered diffraction (EBSD). EBIC and CL profiles across grain boundari… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
29
4

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
2
29
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Experimental details of these measurements are given in Ref. , and results obtained on CuInSe 2 , and Cu(In,Ga)Se 2 are shown in Figs. and .…”
Section: Impact Of Extended Structural Defects On Short‐circuit Currementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Experimental details of these measurements are given in Ref. , and results obtained on CuInSe 2 , and Cu(In,Ga)Se 2 are shown in Figs. and .…”
Section: Impact Of Extended Structural Defects On Short‐circuit Currementioning
confidence: 99%
“…28,32,33 Decreases are found to be as large as 30-50 rel.%, while the luminescence maxima exhibit shifts only a few meV. An example of combined EBSD and CL acquisitions at identical positions is shown in Fig.…”
Section: Ebsd Combined With Other Scanning Microscopy Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Generally, these losses can be caused by parasitic and incomplete absorption or non‐efficient charge carrier collection . The electron beam induced current technique (EBIC) promises a reliable and simple experimental way to estimate collection losses but it tends to be impeded by effects of surface recombination …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Measurements in the limit of high surface recombination have been exploited to estimate cross‐section and grain boundary surface recombination velocities which were found to be on the order of 10 5 and 10 4 cm s −1 , respectively . In this cases reliable and direct extraction of the collection function is complicated and fitting procedures are necessary . The use of thin amorphous atomic layer deposition (ALD) Al 2 O 3 layers on the cross‐section is an attempt to actively reduce the cross‐section surface recombination for measurements with low injection energy and current which are susceptible for surface recombination.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%