2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.xcrp.2020.100137
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electron Backscatter Diffraction for Investigating Lithium-Ion Electrode Particle Architectures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

2
56
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 72 publications
2
56
1
Order By: Relevance
“…6 ). Moreover, we also performed electron backscattered diffraction (EBSD) experiments on the LMO-TB sample since EBSD is a complementary technique when exploring defects and surveying the orientation distribution of target materials 34 . Given that the twinning structure can be clearly observed from the cross-section of the LMO-TB particles via EBSD, as illustrated in Supplementary Figs.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6 ). Moreover, we also performed electron backscattered diffraction (EBSD) experiments on the LMO-TB sample since EBSD is a complementary technique when exploring defects and surveying the orientation distribution of target materials 34 . Given that the twinning structure can be clearly observed from the cross-section of the LMO-TB particles via EBSD, as illustrated in Supplementary Figs.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The particle size distribution of ZSO:Eu 3+ analyzed by SEM was determined to be approximately 300–400 nm. The crystallite size was also estimated from the XRD (410) peak using the Scherrer formula [ 50 , 51 ]. The calculated crystallite size of ZSO:Eu 3+ was 430–437 nm, which was comparable to the result of SEM analysis.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The resolution of EBSD is dependent on the spot size of the electron beam as well as the size of the steps between each measurement, and since images are reconstructed from a series of point measurements the field of view is only limited by the time that the user is willing to commit to the measurement and perhaps their data storage capabilities. Quinn et al [37] applied EBSD to NMC particles with a resolution of about 50 nm (Figure 2a) and quantified the orientation of grains within NMC particles while also showing through basic modeling that the orientation of grains within particles will greatly affect the transport dynamics of lithium during operation. While this work presented opportunities for EBSD in 2D, gathering the grain information in 3D is essential to accurately model transport within full particles.…”
Section: Laboratory-based Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Correlative FIB-SEM, EDS, and TOF-SIMS was demonstrated by Sui et al, [40] and showed the power of these techniques for identifying lithium trapping sites within particles and heterogeneous elemental distributions within particles that would affect lithium transport and rate of degradation of cells. [37] Copyright 2020, Elsevier. b) 3D image of the grain structure within an NMC particle quantified using FIB-EBSD.…”
Section: Laboratory-based Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%