1982
DOI: 10.1063/1.93190
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electron and hole impact ionization coefficients in InP determined by photomultiplication measurements

Abstract: The electron and hole ionization coefficients α and β in (100) InP have been determined through analysis of photomultiplication data on p+-n and n+-p junctions grown by liquid phase epitaxy (LPE). A special device structure is described which allows reproducible thinning of the substrate in order to achieve pure carrier injection from either side of the p-n junction. By fabricating wafers with depletion layer doping levels from 1.2×1015 to 1.2×1017 cm−3, α and β have been determined over a wider range of elect… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
34
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 149 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
2
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In general, first, calculate electric field as a function of reverse voltages and positions; secondly, choose ionization rate for electron and hole (we calculate our experiments with Osaka and Cook's InP ionization rates [17][18]); thirdly, the positions where electric field drops to zero at a given bias are calculated, and the distance from these zero field positions to the position of x=0 is used as depletion region width.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, first, calculate electric field as a function of reverse voltages and positions; secondly, choose ionization rate for electron and hole (we calculate our experiments with Osaka and Cook's InP ionization rates [17][18]); thirdly, the positions where electric field drops to zero at a given bias are calculated, and the distance from these zero field positions to the position of x=0 is used as depletion region width.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the multiplication region scales down, the electric field should be increased in order to achieve the same gain. But the ratio   / in InP material tends to become unity when the applied electric field grows stronger [3,4] . Therefore, according to the McIntyre's theory, the noise performance of APDs with a thinner multiplication region will be poorer.…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Tunneling current can be excluded by setting . Lastly, presence of dead space can be ignored by assuming zero dead space for both electrons and holes and by employing ionization coefficients available for bulk InP, in which the dead-space effects are inherently neglected [22]. Results from each of these three sets of incomplete calculations are compared to those from the complete calculation in Fig.…”
Section: B Competing Effects Of Avalanche Excess Noise Bandwidth Amentioning
confidence: 99%