2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.gca.2018.11.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electron accepting capacity of dissolved and particulate organic matter control CO2 and CH4 formation in peat soils

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

17
89
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(113 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
17
89
2
Order By: Relevance
“…However, several studies have demonstrated relatively high rates of decomposition in peat (as heterotrophic production of CO 2 ) when the thermodynamic yield indicated by inorganic TEAs would suggest otherwise (Deppe et al, 2010;Dettling et al, 2006;Kane et al, 2013;Keller & Bridgham, 2007;Vile et al, 2003). A growing body of literature draws attention to the importance of humic substances and organometallic complexes in governing anaerobic metabolism in organic soil (Gao et al, 2019;Heitmann et al, 2007;Klüpfel et al, 2014;Lipson et al, 2010). Humic substances are rapid scavengers of oxidants (Bauer et al, 2007;Brouns et al, 2014) and as such would be expected to be particularly effective electron acceptors in peatlands with a fluctuating WT or with increased colonization of sedges (cf.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, several studies have demonstrated relatively high rates of decomposition in peat (as heterotrophic production of CO 2 ) when the thermodynamic yield indicated by inorganic TEAs would suggest otherwise (Deppe et al, 2010;Dettling et al, 2006;Kane et al, 2013;Keller & Bridgham, 2007;Vile et al, 2003). A growing body of literature draws attention to the importance of humic substances and organometallic complexes in governing anaerobic metabolism in organic soil (Gao et al, 2019;Heitmann et al, 2007;Klüpfel et al, 2014;Lipson et al, 2010). Humic substances are rapid scavengers of oxidants (Bauer et al, 2007;Brouns et al, 2014) and as such would be expected to be particularly effective electron acceptors in peatlands with a fluctuating WT or with increased colonization of sedges (cf.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other factors might include the role of humic substances, soil heterogeneity and microsites, salinity, pH, and a breakdown of the REDOX ladder conceptual framework. For example, there is evidence that humic substances can suppress CH 4 production, by becoming anaerobic election acceptors (Blodau and Deppe, 2012), and more recently particulate organic matter itself has been shown to be an important electron acceptor in peat soils (Gao et al, 2019). Microsites (< 10 µm) with limited gas and water exchange with surrounding soil pore space may also affect overall soil REDOX potential and CH 4 production by permitting localized electron acceptor depletion or abundance (Sey et al, 2008).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whereas the potential of inorganic electron acceptors to suppress methanogenic activity is well studied (Yao et al, 1999;Fenchel et al, 2012), information on the role of humic substances as organic electron acceptors remain scarce. Klüpfel et al (2014) revealed the potential of humic substances to be reduced 90 and re-oxidized at oxic-anoxic interfaces in peatlands, sediments or soils underlying water table fluctuations and it has recently been shown that availability of EAC in OM controls CO2 and CH4 production in peat soils poor in inorganic EAs (Gao et al, 2019). As sediments from the lake under study here are also rich in OM, we wanted to verify if electron accepting (EAC) and donating capacities (EDC) of humic substances also play a role in explaining spatial variabilities of CO2 and CH4 production 95 in lake sediments that are not subjected to water table fluctuations but might to a small extent in the upper parts of the sediments be influenced by oxygen from the water column due to the in our case prevalent perennial circulation (Lau et al, 2016).…”
Section: Ch3cooh  Co2 + Ch4mentioning
confidence: 99%