“…These patterns can be explained by abiotic and biotic factors: the intolerance of most fungi to anoxic conditions (Kavanagh, 2011) constraining most taxa to shallow peat, and the colocation of the dominant ErMF with their shallowly rooted Ericaceae hosts (Moore et al, 2002; Wallén, 1987). In contrast, the broad range of moisture niches, metabolic pathways and redox tolerance among soil prokaryotes (e.g., Bodelier & Dedysh, 2013; Lennon et al, 2012) and the strong sensitivity of prokaryote communities to changes in soil moisture (e.g., Bapiri et al, 2010; Barnard et al, 2013) explain their shift with WT treatments in both drier surface peat as well as at the acrotelm–catotelm boundary where redox conditions are most dynamic (Kane et al, 2019; Tfaily et al, 2018). These depth‐dependent effects indicate that WT and PFG are among the key shapers of the vertical physicochemical gradients that structure peatland microbial communities (Andersen et al, 2013; Artz et al, 2007; Lin et al, 2014), the activities of which then feed back to modulate carbon cycling along the peat profile (Chanton et al, 2009; Kane et al, 2019; Lin et al, 2014; Tfaily et al, 2018).…”