2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemphys.2012.10.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electromodulation of photoluminescence in vacuum-evaporated films of bathocuproine

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In comparison to the photoluminescence of the Cu­(I) complexes in doped films (20 wt % in CBP:TcTa (7:3)) at ambient temperature, the electroluminescence was slightly shifted, while the curve progression was very similar (SI Figures S186–S190). The observed shift is very small and can be explained by the generalized Stark effect or partial reabsorption by the neighboring organic layers within the OLED heterostructure, absent when the photoluminescence was investigated. , The electroluminescence originates from the Cu­(I) complexes and not from the matrix, while for the photoluminescence, a slight contribution from the matrix is visible. In general, the emission of the doped films and the corresponding OLEDs are comparable.…”
Section: Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…In comparison to the photoluminescence of the Cu­(I) complexes in doped films (20 wt % in CBP:TcTa (7:3)) at ambient temperature, the electroluminescence was slightly shifted, while the curve progression was very similar (SI Figures S186–S190). The observed shift is very small and can be explained by the generalized Stark effect or partial reabsorption by the neighboring organic layers within the OLED heterostructure, absent when the photoluminescence was investigated. , The electroluminescence originates from the Cu­(I) complexes and not from the matrix, while for the photoluminescence, a slight contribution from the matrix is visible. In general, the emission of the doped films and the corresponding OLEDs are comparable.…”
Section: Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…This peak energy (∼3.0 eV) hardly corresponds to the offset between the LUMO of BCP (∼3.0 eV) and the HOMO of SAFDPA (∼5.6 eV). The PL spectra of BCP (Figure b) show secondary peaks at 520 nm owing to the effect of excimers, dimers, or other aggregates which destroy by doping SAFDPA. The PL spectra of mixture films of SAFDPA:TmPyPB of 1:1 (w:w) do not show the red shift relative to the PL spectrum of SAFDPA, as exhibited in Figure c.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although 1,10-phenanthroline has a very small fluorescence quantum yield (Φ F = 0.0087 in DCM) and a short lifetime (t < 1 ns) (11), derivatives of 1,10-phenanthroline have drawn interest due to their emissive properties. From low molecular weight, well defined, structures to polymers and metal complexes, compounds using 1,10-phenanthroline as a building block have been used as fluorescent sensors (12)(13)(14)(15), photocatalysts (16)(17)(18)(19)(20), imaging agents (21)(22)(23), and OLEDs (24)(25)(26) among other optoelectronic applications (27)(28)(29)(30).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%