2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.dcan.2019.12.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electromagnetic spectrum chipless radio frequency identification: A review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…According to Figure 4 , an eligible coding capacity of 60 bits can be then obtained, leading to theoretical spatial coding density of about 300 bits/cm 2 . Such a performance is several orders of magnitude better than coding density obtained with a chipless RFID system [ 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 ], mainly since THz wavelengths are a hundred times smaller than in the RF .…”
Section: Principle and Theory Of Codingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…According to Figure 4 , an eligible coding capacity of 60 bits can be then obtained, leading to theoretical spatial coding density of about 300 bits/cm 2 . Such a performance is several orders of magnitude better than coding density obtained with a chipless RFID system [ 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 ], mainly since THz wavelengths are a hundred times smaller than in the RF .…”
Section: Principle and Theory Of Codingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chipless RFID is mainly based on resonator technology and the tag’s performance of course depends on the resonators design, number, the selected frequency range, and on the coding technique. Moreover, in the RF domain mainly, the design of chipless structures, and more generally the research for efficient performance, remains a hot topic subject with very rapid development [ 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 ]. The best performances published in the last two years reach about 30 bits but remains for the majority around 20 bits, corresponding to spatial density in the range of 1 bit/cm 2 , very exceptionally around 10 bits/cm 2 or higher.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Co-polar tags can further be delineated as either linearlypolarized or orientation insensitive tags, where linearly-polarized tags require precise polarization alignment between the tag and the reader antenna, while orientation insensitive tags do not [20,27,40,45,[69][70][71][72][73][74]. There are also dual-polarized tags that are a special case of co-polar tags; they are designed to be read in two orthogonal polarizations that are co-polar with the polarization of the reader antenna.…”
Section: Chipless Rfid Measurement Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are also dual-polarized tags that are a special case of co-polar tags; they are designed to be read in two orthogonal polarizations that are co-polar with the polarization of the reader antenna. In the case of dual-polarized tags, the reader antenna is typically either dual-polarized, or the orientation of the reader antenna relative to the tag is changed to measure the tag in the two polarizations [69,72,[75][76][77][78]. Fig.…”
Section: Chipless Rfid Measurement Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bazı mikrodalga aktif etiketler, karşılaştırılabilir UHF etiketlerinden daha az olan 30 metreye kadar olan aralıklardan okunabilir. Bununla birlikte, mikrodalga RFID etiketlerinin fiziksel uygulamaları, daha düşük frekanslı RFID etiketlerinden çok daha küçük ve kompakt olabilir [22].  RFID'ye uygulanan ultra geniş bant (UWB) teknolojisi oldukça yenidir.…”
Section: Rfid Teknolojisi Ve Etiketlerunclassified