2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.pce.2006.02.023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electromagnetic precursors to the 2004 Mid Niigata Prefecture earthquake

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

4
27
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
4
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Fraser-Smith et al (1990) reported ultra-low frequency (ULF) magnetic field activity in the frequency range 0.01-0.2 Hz that began around 12 days before the main shock of the Loma Prieta earthquake. Similar observations are also reported by Molchanov et al (1992) (M S = 6, Spitak), Hayakawa et al (2006) (M S = 8, Guam), and Prattes et al (2011) (M = 6.3, L'Aquila) amongst others. However, not all large earthquakes exhibit such phenomena.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Fraser-Smith et al (1990) reported ultra-low frequency (ULF) magnetic field activity in the frequency range 0.01-0.2 Hz that began around 12 days before the main shock of the Loma Prieta earthquake. Similar observations are also reported by Molchanov et al (1992) (M S = 6, Spitak), Hayakawa et al (2006) (M S = 8, Guam), and Prattes et al (2011) (M = 6.3, L'Aquila) amongst others. However, not all large earthquakes exhibit such phenomena.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…In addition, variations of some parameters in the ground, atmosphere and ionosphere during the preparatory phase of an earthquake can produce disturbances in the VLF/LF signals. As reported in many previous studies (Biagi et al, 2001a,b;Biagi and Hayakawa, 2002;Biagi et al, 2004Biagi et al, Q2 , 2005, 2008Hayakawa and Sato, 1994;Hayakawa et al, 1996Hayakawa et al, , 20062010;Morgounov et al, 1994; 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 Molchanov et al, 2006;Rozhnoi et al, 2004Rozhnoi et al, , 2005, 20072009), these disturbances are classified as anomalies; different analysis methods such as the residual dA/dP (Rozhnoi et al, 2004), terminator time TT (Hayakawa et al, 1996), Wavelet spectra and Principal-Component Analysis have been used (Biagi et al, , 2008. In this paper, we analyse some sampled LF signals in the framework of the European radio network, and using the Wavelet analysis, we investigate possible connections between anomalies in the radio signals and the M w ¼ 6.5 earthquake in Crete on October 12, 2013.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 71%
“…Even though Hayakawa et al (2006) have already presented the convincing results on the presence of precursory ionospheric perturbations for this Niigata-chuetsu EQ, we repeat in Fig. 2 the seismo-ionospheric perturbations on the most favorable propagation path of JJY-KCH as shown in Fig.1.…”
Section: Analysis Methods and Analysis Resultsmentioning
confidence: 57%