1976
DOI: 10.1364/josa.66.000320
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electromagnetic momentum and momentum flow in dielectric waveguides

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
18
0

Year Published

1988
1988
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The first model that we present is the Drude-Lorentz model for dielectric media. A similar treatment was previously made by Haus and Kogelnik [33]. In this model, the atomic nuclei are fixed and the electrons are bound by harmonic potentials U i (r i ) = mω 2 i r 2 i /2, where m represents the electron mass, r i the distance of each electron to its equilibrium position and ω i the natural frequency of the harmonic oscillator.…”
Section: Classical Model For a Linear Dielectric Mediummentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The first model that we present is the Drude-Lorentz model for dielectric media. A similar treatment was previously made by Haus and Kogelnik [33]. In this model, the atomic nuclei are fixed and the electrons are bound by harmonic potentials U i (r i ) = mω 2 i r 2 i /2, where m represents the electron mass, r i the distance of each electron to its equilibrium position and ω i the natural frequency of the harmonic oscillator.…”
Section: Classical Model For a Linear Dielectric Mediummentioning
confidence: 94%
“…where v ph is the phase velocity and n ph is the phase index [33,34]. Similar expressions are valid for the momentum flow of the transmitted M t and reflected M r surface waves.…”
Section: The Balance Of Elecromagnetic Power and Momentum Flowmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(A1) and using the trigonometric relation = 1 + , we have The relation between the group velocity , the phase velocity , and the timeaveraged EM energy per unit length is given by [29][30][31] Proving that the spatial-averaged of the radiation pressure, and therefore the induced optical force, can be expressed by the longitudinal component of the EM energy. On the other hand, the difference between the EM energy components − represents the EM momentum flow in the propagation direction (also given by the zz-component of the Maxwell stress tensor integrated over the waveguide cross section) [30] . Thus, the point of maximum on the radiation pressure ( ) represents a minimum for the momentum flow ( − ) for a given waveguide area .…”
Section: Supplementary Informationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…. In that case, it is possible to show that the difference between and relies on the fraction of energy in each component, more precisely = − ⁄ [29][30][31] . In addition, the group index is related to the total EM energy by = ⁄ ; By inserting these results in Eq.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%