2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2019.02.246
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electromagnetic interference shielding effectiveness in 3D flower-like MoS2-rGO/gadolinium-doped nanocomposites

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
29
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
1
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As can be illustrated in Figure 5(a), the XRD patterns of the MoS 2 /rGO composites exhibit characteristic peaks at 2θ = 14:1; 33.6; 39.84; and 58.1°corresponding to the (002), (100), (103), and (110) planes, respectively, which are well agreed with the 2H hexagonal phase of MoS 2 [26]. The increase of MoS 2 /rGO mass ratio led to the gradually increase in intensity of MoS 2 -related peaks, which could be clearly observed at the (002) lattice plane.…”
Section: Evaluation Of Photocatalytic Activitysupporting
confidence: 57%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As can be illustrated in Figure 5(a), the XRD patterns of the MoS 2 /rGO composites exhibit characteristic peaks at 2θ = 14:1; 33.6; 39.84; and 58.1°corresponding to the (002), (100), (103), and (110) planes, respectively, which are well agreed with the 2H hexagonal phase of MoS 2 [26]. The increase of MoS 2 /rGO mass ratio led to the gradually increase in intensity of MoS 2 -related peaks, which could be clearly observed at the (002) lattice plane.…”
Section: Evaluation Of Photocatalytic Activitysupporting
confidence: 57%
“…The residual concentration of RhB was recorded using a UV-Vis spectrometer. [26]. These featured peaks in composites were obtuse and lower (peak at 002) than those of pristine MoS 2 due to the overlap of the rGO layers between MoS 2 crystals because of composite formation (as shown in Figure 1(a)).…”
Section: Evaluation Of Photocatalytic Activitymentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The MoS 2 material is semiconductors (bandgap of ∼1.2 eV) with parabolic energy dispersion relation. The bandgap can be tuned by quantum confinement effect lead by different surface morphology; hence MoS 2 shows the candidacy for EMI shielding application 55,56 . As compared to 2D graphene, pure MoS 2 has lower electron conductivity and lower permittivity due to poor charge transfer.…”
Section: Advantage and Disadvantage Of Mxenes In Comparison With Other 2d Materialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The total SE was calculated according equations (1) to (3). 29,30 According to equation (4), SSE t (ratio of specific shielding effectiveness (SSE) to thickness) was used to compare the SE of materials with different thickness and density. where SE T is total shielding effectiveness [dB], SE A is absorption effectiveness [dB], SE R is reflection effectiveness [dB], and t is the thickness of samples [cm].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%