2009 International Symposium on Electromagnetic Compatibility - EMC Europe 2009
DOI: 10.1109/emceurope.2009.5189709
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electromagnetic absorbers based on chiral honeycomb slab

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A mayor difference with the one-layer grid is the apparition of resonant transmissions, the first at f=9. 5 GHz, which may be attributed to the electromagnetic coupling between both metal layers.…”
Section: Implementation and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A mayor difference with the one-layer grid is the apparition of resonant transmissions, the first at f=9. 5 GHz, which may be attributed to the electromagnetic coupling between both metal layers.…”
Section: Implementation and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Other implications of its geometrical chirality, in terms of mechanical properties, have been studied, like enhanced compressive strength capabilities, shear stiffness compared to classical centresymmetric honeycomb configurations, or a sinclastic curvature feature [1], [4]. In 2009, David et al proposed their application in electromagnetic absorbers [5] and, in 2010, Kopyt et al studied the electromagnetic behavior of such structure implemented with dielectrics (polymers), in order to check whether their structural chirality translates into chiral electromagnetic behavior (bianisotropy) [1], with negative results. It is worth noticing that they characterized a single layer of the structure: that means the result is not geometrically chiral in the 3D space, so no bi-anisotropic behavior should have been expected [6], [7].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is in contrast with 3D chirality, where the sense of such rotation does not change upon reversal of the observation direction [16]; in this case, the eigenmodes are two corotating elliptical polarizations, instead of contrarotating circular polarizations, as in 3D chiral (bi-isotropic) materials [14,19]. This "asymmetric transmission" is a dissipative effect and can only be observed in lossy anisotropic structures [16], while the structures studied in [1,10] are isotropic in the plane.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…In 2009, David et al proposed the application of a chiral honeycomb in electromagnetic absorbers [10]; later, in 2010, Kopyt et al studied the electromagnetic behavior of such structure implemented with dielectrics (polymers), in order to check whether their structural chirality translates into chiral electromagnetic behavior (bianisotropy) [1], with negative results. That is, the structural chirality of the investigated honeycombs did not induce electromagnetic chirality effects.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following two parameters quantitatively describe reflection, absorption, and transmission of such EM waves in materials: 1) Shielding Effectiveness (SE) (or its negative, called Shielding Efficiency) and 2) Reflection Effectiveness (or its negative, called Reflection Efficiency). As illustrated in Figure , a Vector Network Analyzer (VNA), can measure Input Power ( P in ) for the EMI shield, the Reflected Power ( P refl ), and the Transmitted Power ( P out ) – as a function of EM wave frequency. These yield Shielding and Reflection coefficients as will be shown in next sections.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%