2004
DOI: 10.1007/s10008-004-0565-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electrolytic molybdenum oxides in lithium batteries

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The large initial capacity loss of the Sn@C fiber electrode is partly attributed to the formation of an SEI layer. [39][40][41] Figures 7 and 8 present the electrochemical performances of Sn1Pan1 and Sn2Pan3 with lower tin content. In comparison, the samples of Sn3Pan2_700, Sn1Pan1_700, and Sn2Pan3_700 carbonized at 700 8C deliver initial discharge capacities of 929.2, 1329.8, and 1137.0 mAh g 21 , respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The large initial capacity loss of the Sn@C fiber electrode is partly attributed to the formation of an SEI layer. [39][40][41] Figures 7 and 8 present the electrochemical performances of Sn1Pan1 and Sn2Pan3 with lower tin content. In comparison, the samples of Sn3Pan2_700, Sn1Pan1_700, and Sn2Pan3_700 carbonized at 700 8C deliver initial discharge capacities of 929.2, 1329.8, and 1137.0 mAh g 21 , respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the subsequent charge process, the charge capacities are 473.5, 808.6, and 720.2 mAh g 21 in Sn1Pan1_500, Sn1Pan1_700, and Sn1Pan1_800, respectively. 42,43 the reversible capacities of tin were soon decreased if the Sn particles were aggregated during lithiation/ delithiation processes. The as-synthesized Sn@C composites have the advantage that the aggregations of metal or metal oxide enwrapped in carbon fibers are weakened during the charging and discharging processes.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Two types of vacant sites (intralayers and interlayers) are available in MoO 3 crystal structure for hosting foreign ions like lithium [7,8]. The theoretical capacity of molybdenum oxide vs. Li + /Li reaches C = 1117 mAh g -1 , the volume change during Li + intercalation-deintercalation is calculated to be as much as 104% [9,10]. However, slow solid-state diffusion of Li + as well as low conductivity decrease the reversible capacity of MoO 3 [11][12][13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Meanwhile, the molybdenum oxides have been one of the promising materials for wide application fields such as electrochromic devices, battery electrodes, catalysis, and gas sensors due to their particular structural and optical properties 12–16. Among various methods, good crystallized and stable molybdenum dioxide (MoO 2 ) or molybdenum trioxide (MoO 3 ) could be obtained by performing the electrodeposition and thermal annealing that are fast, simple, and cost‐effective processes 17.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%