2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2008.05.092
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electrokinetic remediation of wood preservative contaminated soil containing copper, chromium, and arsenic

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
17
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
1
17
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Even though Cr is mainly removed to the anode side in these experiments (table 4), the concentration profiles clearly show that transport towards the cathode also takes place. Migration of Cr(III) towards the cathode has also been found in previous works (Buchireddy et al, 2009;Reddy and Chintamreddy, 2004) in parallel with decreasing pH. In our experiments the original soil pH is 7-7.8, and final values are 8-9, so no acidification occurs.…”
Section: Heavy Metal Profiles In the Soil And In Soil Solutionsupporting
confidence: 88%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Even though Cr is mainly removed to the anode side in these experiments (table 4), the concentration profiles clearly show that transport towards the cathode also takes place. Migration of Cr(III) towards the cathode has also been found in previous works (Buchireddy et al, 2009;Reddy and Chintamreddy, 2004) in parallel with decreasing pH. In our experiments the original soil pH is 7-7.8, and final values are 8-9, so no acidification occurs.…”
Section: Heavy Metal Profiles In the Soil And In Soil Solutionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Removals are nevertheless the highest reported in the literature so far, for a real Cu and Cr-contaminated calcareous soil (Ottosen et al, 2005b). Buchireddy et al (2009) and (Reddy and Chintamreddy, 2004) report higher Cr-removals (72% and 46-82%, respectively) with an artificially spiked soil, but these cannot be compared with our results, where contamination dates back to the 1960's . These results are encouraging and highlight the potential of EDR to remediate soils which are contaminated with a mixture of heavy metals at a neutral pH by choosing a good enhancement solution.…”
Section: Heavy Metal Profiles In the Soil And In Soil Solutioncontrasting
confidence: 78%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Many of the large facilities that presently apply CCA, or used to apply it in the past, caused local soil pollution with Cu (Zagury et al 2003 ;Mench and Bes 2009 ;Kumpiene et al 2006 ;Morrell and Hoffman 2004 ;Bes and Mench 2008 ). Cu concentrations in those soils may significantly exceed 1,000 mg/kg (Buchireddy et al 2009 ). Some of such sites have turned into derelict areas, either barren or with poor vegetation (Mench and Bes 2009 ).…”
Section: Other Sites With Cu-contaminated Soilsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7). Low pH in soil causes the dissolution of some minerals in the soil, resulting in the decrease in soil resistance [27], consequently aggravating the IIPGWTE (Fig. 4e and f) and slowing down the movement of the focusing band in HA.…”
Section: The Third Phasementioning
confidence: 99%