2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.seppur.2011.02.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electrokinetic extraction of heavy metals from dredged marine sediment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
47
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 108 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
6
47
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This is in agreement with the findings of Orecchio and Polizzotto [6]. Observed Hg-speciation further confirms that Hg-removal is a main challenge and its removal processes using conventional chemical-physical techniques could be strictly inhibited [30]. On the other hand, the high water amount and dielectric properties of sediments could make MWH a perfect candidate to successfully desorb Hg from marine sediments.…”
Section: Sediment Characterization and Hg-speciationsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This is in agreement with the findings of Orecchio and Polizzotto [6]. Observed Hg-speciation further confirms that Hg-removal is a main challenge and its removal processes using conventional chemical-physical techniques could be strictly inhibited [30]. On the other hand, the high water amount and dielectric properties of sediments could make MWH a perfect candidate to successfully desorb Hg from marine sediments.…”
Section: Sediment Characterization and Hg-speciationsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Synthetic chelates, such as ethylenediamine tetraacetic acid (EDTA) or diethylene triamine pentaacetic acid (DTPA), have largely been employed as enhancing agents in washing [29], EK [30][31][32][33] or phytoextraction [34] treatments. However, they have a relatively high environmental persistence and toxicity as well as a thermal instability at high temperatures [35].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several EKR and EDR studies of polluted sediments have shown limited removal of targeted heavy metals applying the traditional stationary set-up with removal efficiencies generally below 20% with a few exceptions of up to 40% [12,[19][20][21][22].…”
Section: Multivariate Design and Modellingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Suitable flushing solutions had to be selected in order to play different roles, in the context where PAHs and metals both existed in our studied aged model sediment: additives allowing to maintain an acidic pH (nitric acid, acetic acid…) or forming soluble complexes with metals (citric acid, EDTA…) proved to be effective for metal removal (Wang et al 2007;Giannis et al 2009;Alcantara et al 2010;Kim et al 2011). Furthermore, maintaining a basic pH (NaOH, n-butylamine…) or using solubilizing compounds such as surfactants (Tween 80, Igepal CA-720, sodium dodecyl sulfate, alkylpolyglucosides…) or cyclodextrins proved to be effective for PAH removal (Reddy et al 2006;Giannis et al 2007;Pazos et al 2010).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Electrokinetic (EK) remediation is accepted as one of the most suitable technologies for extracting metals from fine-grained sediments of low permeability (Kim et al 2011). Moreover, EK remediation is flexible and can be used as an in situ or ex-situ remediation system (Reddy 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%