2005
DOI: 10.1186/bf03351843
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electrodynamics in the duskside inner magnetosphere and plasmasphere during a super magnetic storm on March 13–15, 1989

Abstract: Variations of cold plasma density distribution and large-scale electric field in the inner magnetosphere and plasmasphere during a geomagnetic storm were investigated by using the observation data of the Akebono satellite which has been carried out for more than 15 yeas since March, 1989. We focus on the super geomagnetic storm on March 13-15, 1989, for which the maximum negative excursion of the Dst index was −589 nT. During the main phase of the magnetic storm, the strong convection electric field with a spa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
23
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
1
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As a result, six million residents in the province of Quebec were left without electrical power for more than 9 h. Furthermore, a low-latitude aurora was visible across the southern United States during the night of March 13 and early hours of March 14 (Allen et al 1989). Although the solar wind information is not available for this period, geospace disturbances during this extreme storm have been studied by using satellite data (e.g., Fujii et al 1992;Greenspan et al 1991;Okada et al 1993;Rasmussen and Greenspan 1993;Rich and Denig 1992;Shinbori et al 2005;Sojka et al 1994) and ground-based ionospheric data (e.g., Batista et al 1991;Hajkowicz 1991;Lakshmi et al 1991;Walker and Wong 1993;Yeh et al 1992).…”
Section: Overview Of the March 13-14 1989 Storm Eventmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result, six million residents in the province of Quebec were left without electrical power for more than 9 h. Furthermore, a low-latitude aurora was visible across the southern United States during the night of March 13 and early hours of March 14 (Allen et al 1989). Although the solar wind information is not available for this period, geospace disturbances during this extreme storm have been studied by using satellite data (e.g., Fujii et al 1992;Greenspan et al 1991;Okada et al 1993;Rasmussen and Greenspan 1993;Rich and Denig 1992;Shinbori et al 2005;Sojka et al 1994) and ground-based ionospheric data (e.g., Batista et al 1991;Hajkowicz 1991;Lakshmi et al 1991;Walker and Wong 1993;Yeh et al 1992).…”
Section: Overview Of the March 13-14 1989 Storm Eventmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wilson et al (2001) suggested that the electric field associated with the DP2 currents might have contributed to the development of the storm ring current in the inner magnetosphere. Actually, strong convection electric fields have been observed by CRRES and Akebono at L = 2-6 (Wygant et al 1998;Shinbori et al 2005;Nishimura et al 2006). The electric field is as strong as 46 mV/m during the major storm on 13 March, 1989 (Shinbori et al 2005).…”
Section: Stormtime Electric Field and Eej/cejmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Actually, strong convection electric fields have been observed by CRRES and Akebono at L = 2-6 (Wygant et al 1998;Shinbori et al 2005;Nishimura et al 2006). The electric field is as strong as 46 mV/m during the major storm on 13 March, 1989 (Shinbori et al 2005). The convection electric field penetrates to the equatorial ionosphere, intensifying the EEJ on the dayside (Kikuchi et al 2008).…”
Section: Stormtime Electric Field and Eej/cejmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…In order this mechanism to work, energetic electrons need to be injected into the inner plasmasphere during geomagnetic storms. Storm-time enhanced convection electric fields, which are larger than a few mV/m (Shinbori et al, 2005) may contribute to the injection of energetic particles into the inner plasmasphere and these particles cause a direct generation of fast Z-mode waves through cyclotron-type interactions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%