2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.ssi.2005.09.043
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electrode polarization at the Pd/proton conductor interface

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
7
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
7
1
Order By: Relevance
“…From the dependence of the I o vs. 1/T, the activation energy was calculated to be 0.55 ± 0.05 eV, while from the dependence of s vs. 1/T (which was obtained by the 4-point technique under reducing conditions), the activation energy was calculated to be 0.25 eV. The apparent activation energy (0.55 ± 0.05 eV) is similar to the activation energy observed in the case of the PdeSrCe 0.95 Yb 0.05 O 3-a system (0.73 eV) [25], the AueSr 0.995 Ce 0.95 Y 0.05 O 2.970 system (0.60 eV), the NieSr 0.995-Ce 0.95 Y 0.05 O 2.970 system (0.70 eV) for the H 2 oxidation, and the PteSr 0.995 Ce 0.95 Y 0.05 O 2.970 system (0.74 eV) [18] while is lower compared to the activation energy observed for the Ag-SCY (1.4 eV) [22] or the AgeSr 0.995 Ce 0.95 Y 0.05 O 2.970 (1.0 eV) system [21]. The activation energy of the exchange current density calculated in the present work can be compared to those reported in literature for metals over SCY electrolyte [23,28].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 61%
“…From the dependence of the I o vs. 1/T, the activation energy was calculated to be 0.55 ± 0.05 eV, while from the dependence of s vs. 1/T (which was obtained by the 4-point technique under reducing conditions), the activation energy was calculated to be 0.25 eV. The apparent activation energy (0.55 ± 0.05 eV) is similar to the activation energy observed in the case of the PdeSrCe 0.95 Yb 0.05 O 3-a system (0.73 eV) [25], the AueSr 0.995 Ce 0.95 Y 0.05 O 2.970 system (0.60 eV), the NieSr 0.995-Ce 0.95 Y 0.05 O 2.970 system (0.70 eV) for the H 2 oxidation, and the PteSr 0.995 Ce 0.95 Y 0.05 O 2.970 system (0.74 eV) [18] while is lower compared to the activation energy observed for the Ag-SCY (1.4 eV) [22] or the AgeSr 0.995 Ce 0.95 Y 0.05 O 2.970 (1.0 eV) system [21]. The activation energy of the exchange current density calculated in the present work can be compared to those reported in literature for metals over SCY electrolyte [23,28].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 61%
“…Previous studies showed clearly that by using similar operating atmospheres, the proton conducting solid electrolyte cell, used in the present study, is not reported to reduce and to develop electronic conductivity [14,20]. In order to evaluate the effect of mass transport and the appearance of limiting currents, the current-overpotential data are plotted in a linear scale.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…However, in the case of hydrogen oxidation reaction, n equals either to unity or to two depending on the type of hydrogen, either atomic or molecular, that participates in the rate determining step. Nevertheless, as reported in literature, hydrogen is dissociatively adsorbed on the electrode's surface and participates as hydrogen ad-atom in the charge transfer reaction [11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20]. Consequently, in the following analysis, n is considered equal to unity.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 2 more Smart Citations