1976
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-66082-5_15
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electrocochleography

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
25
0

Year Published

1984
1984
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
3
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…ECochG responses result from the superimposition of three components, two originating from receptor elements, the cochlear microphonic (CM) and the summating potential (SP), and the third, the compound action potential (CAP), arising from the synchronous activation of auditory nerve fibers innervating the basal portion of the cochlea (Eggermont, 1976). CM responses are believed to originate mainly from the sum of the extracellular components of receptor potentials arising from OHCs located in the basal cochlear region (Dallos and Cheatham, 1976).…”
Section: Cochlear Potentialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…ECochG responses result from the superimposition of three components, two originating from receptor elements, the cochlear microphonic (CM) and the summating potential (SP), and the third, the compound action potential (CAP), arising from the synchronous activation of auditory nerve fibers innervating the basal portion of the cochlea (Eggermont, 1976). CM responses are believed to originate mainly from the sum of the extracellular components of receptor potentials arising from OHCs located in the basal cochlear region (Dallos and Cheatham, 1976).…”
Section: Cochlear Potentialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Receptor and neural activities are intermingled in ECochG waveforms, often preventing the identification of individual components. Since CM activity is strictly related to basilar membrane motion, the procedure of averaging the potentials evoked separately by condensation and rarefaction stimuli is generally used to extract both the SP and the CAP components (Eggermont, 1976). Fig.…”
Section: Cochlear Potentialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In the past, cochlear microphonics have been difficult to distinguish from the electrical artifact that often accompanies the generation of a stimulus at the transducer (Eggermont, 1976). This difficulty occurs because of the temporal proximity of the cochlear microphonic response to the onset of the stimulus and because the cochlear microphonic response so closely resembles the stimulating waveform.…”
Section: Cochlear Microphonicsmentioning
confidence: 99%