2007
DOI: 10.3390/12071410
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electrochemical Synthesis and Structural Characterization of a Novel Mixed-valence Copper (I)-copper (II) Complex: {[Bis(ethylenediamine) Copper (II)] Bis[diiodocuprate (I)]}

Abstract: A novel, mixed-valent copper(I)-copper(II) complex, {[bis(ethylenediamine)copper(II)] bis[diiodocuprate(I)]} (1), has been prepared by electrochemical dissolution of a sacrificial copper anode in a solution of ethylenediamine (en), I 2 and tetraethylammoniumperchlorate (TEAP) as supporting electrolyte in acetonitrile (AcN) and characterized by single-crystal X-ray structure determination. The crystal structure of the complex 1 shows that it consists of a CuI 2 polymer formed from I -ligands bridging Cu(I) ions… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
(22 reference statements)
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The value of the anodic peak potential coincides with that of freshly prepared [n-Bu 4 N][CuCl 2 ] [22] at E a = 0.20 V (Figures 3 and S17-S20), and to that of the Cu I center in related [Cu(en) 2 ][CuI 2 ] 2 . [23] The second redox process was assigned to [Cu(N4)] + at E a = À 0.22 V, which is close to the anodic peak of the cupric analogue [Cu(N4)(ClO 4 )]ClO 4 at E a = À 0.18 V, thus evidencing their closely related coordination environments (Figures S21-S23). CV of the latter complex displays a reversible copper-centered process at E 1/2 = À 0.20 V vs Fc + /Fc (0.43 V vs NHE) [21] for the couple [Cu(N4)(ClO 4 )] + /[Cu(N4)(ClO 4 )], Figure 3.…”
Section: Electrochemistrymentioning
confidence: 76%
“…The value of the anodic peak potential coincides with that of freshly prepared [n-Bu 4 N][CuCl 2 ] [22] at E a = 0.20 V (Figures 3 and S17-S20), and to that of the Cu I center in related [Cu(en) 2 ][CuI 2 ] 2 . [23] The second redox process was assigned to [Cu(N4)] + at E a = À 0.22 V, which is close to the anodic peak of the cupric analogue [Cu(N4)(ClO 4 )]ClO 4 at E a = À 0.18 V, thus evidencing their closely related coordination environments (Figures S21-S23). CV of the latter complex displays a reversible copper-centered process at E 1/2 = À 0.20 V vs Fc + /Fc (0.43 V vs NHE) [21] for the couple [Cu(N4)(ClO 4 )] + /[Cu(N4)(ClO 4 )], Figure 3.…”
Section: Electrochemistrymentioning
confidence: 76%
“…Another interesting feature in the compound reported by Luo et al is the presence of Cu I centers in the linear CuO 2 and CuN 2 environment, similar to that of 1 and 2 . Linear conformations are common in other d 10 coordination polymers such as Au I , and Ag I ; , however, Cu I is usually reported presenting trigonal , and tetrahedral , geometries, while Cu I /Cu II and Cu I CPs containing linear Cu I are more scarce . On the other hand, according to the Robin and Day classification, 1 and 2 can be described as Class I mixed valence compounds, since in both structures the Cu I and Cu II cations can be identified by the difference in their coordination geometries. , …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…48 Another interesting feature in the compound reported by Luo et al is the presence of Cu I centers in the linear CuO 2 and CuN 2 environment, similar to that of 1 and 2. Linear conformations are common in other d 10 coordination polymers such as Au I49,50 and Ag I ; 51,52 however, Cu I is usually reported presenting trigonal 53,54 and tetrahedral 55,56 geometries, while Cu I /Cu II and Cu I CPs containing linear Cu I are more scarce. 57 On the other hand, according to the Robin and Day classification, 1 and 2 can be described as Class I mixed valence compounds, since in both structures the Cu I and Cu II cations can be identified by the difference in their coordination geometries.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3b). 24 Obviously, the structural feature of the coexisting Cu 2+ and Cu + ions in 1 provides the possibility to undergo the structural transformation. The phase purity of the obtained claybank crystals of 2 was confirmed by the PXRD pattern in comparison with the simulated single-crystal data of 2 (Fig.…”
Section: And S2 †)mentioning
confidence: 99%