2020
DOI: 10.1021/acs.analchem.0c04378
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electrochemical Sensing Directions for Next-Generation Healthcare: Trends, Challenges, and Frontiers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
44
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 175 publications
0
44
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, patients have the possibility to test themselves and take necessary actions, such as self-isolation. 40 A clinical study was carried out to evaluate the accuracy and applicability of the system. The assay was applied to both a buffer solution and the blood serum samples collected from COVID-19 patients, compared to the clinically approved methods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, patients have the possibility to test themselves and take necessary actions, such as self-isolation. 40 A clinical study was carried out to evaluate the accuracy and applicability of the system. The assay was applied to both a buffer solution and the blood serum samples collected from COVID-19 patients, compared to the clinically approved methods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With advance in wearable technology, many wearable devices providing important body information like blood glucose concentration, blood oxygen level, blood pressure, and heart rhythms have been sold in the market. Electrochemical sensors are mostly found in the wearable devices, mainly because of their advantages of miniaturization, low cost, fast response, high sensitivity, and specificity (Hernández-Rodríguez et al, 2021). In addition, electrodes can be made on various substrates such as plastic, textile thread, glass, ceramic, or skin.…”
Section: Heath Monitoringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Electrochemical sensors have been effectively validated against laboratory standard methods proving their usefulness as pointof-care tests. [120,121] In contrast, when translated to WEDs, few works have validated the continuous analysis with standard methods. There are several reasons: (i) a method to analyze the noninvasive fluid needs to be standardized (e.g., sweat or ISF); (ii) a sampling method has to be designed and coupled with the standard method (e.g., regional sweat collection); and (iii) real-time analysis of the biofluid is challenging as the determination by the standard method cannot be performed in situ, thus several errors along the manipulation of the sample might rise inconsistent results.…”
Section: The Second Challenge: Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%