2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.promfg.2019.06.145
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electrochemical polishing of selective laser melted Inconel 718

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This happens because there is partial melting of boundary particles and also an important thermal diffusion between solidified metal underneath and loose particles due to the big difference in temperature. [ 15 ] Strategies to remove powder particles attached to the surface include mechanical milling and/or polishing, [ 16 ] electrochemical polishing, [ 17 ] and a combination of abrasion and electrochemical polishing. [ 18 ] The roughness factor (ratio between real surface and completely flat one) decreases with surface area, starting at 6 and going to 3, with 4 being the average value for our 3D printed structures.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This happens because there is partial melting of boundary particles and also an important thermal diffusion between solidified metal underneath and loose particles due to the big difference in temperature. [ 15 ] Strategies to remove powder particles attached to the surface include mechanical milling and/or polishing, [ 16 ] electrochemical polishing, [ 17 ] and a combination of abrasion and electrochemical polishing. [ 18 ] The roughness factor (ratio between real surface and completely flat one) decreases with surface area, starting at 6 and going to 3, with 4 being the average value for our 3D printed structures.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Buffing, grinding, lapping, abrasive flow polishing, plasma electrolytic polishing, magnetic abrasive polishing, laser polishing, and electrochemical polishing can be used to achieve sub-micron surface finish (Figure 25a and 25b). Under optimal conditions (Figure 25c), surface finish has been improved from 17 µm to 0.25 µm of as-printed IN718 [62], but the presence of micropores and detrimental phases in microstructure prevented further polishing. The combination of conductive matrix of IN718 and the presence of non-conductive phases such as pores, inclusions, precipitations and slag prevent uniform surface finish by electrochemical polishing (Figures 25b and 25c).…”
Section: Inconel 718mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The as-built SLM IN718 components have rough surface roughness due to the layer-by-layer manufacturing of the components which causes the 'stair case' effect. In addition, the balling effects from partially melted powder on the side walls lead to extremely poor surface finish in the order of 17-20µm Sa area surface finish [62]. The surface roughness is dependent on the AM techniques and the print parameters used to fabricate the component.…”
Section: Factors Influencing Fatigue Of Slm In718mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the applicability to limited materials, risk of toxicity and selective phase dissolution also raises concern regarding chemical polishing. 17,18 To overcome the problems associated with existing postprocessing methods, researchers started exploring the potential of electrical discharge machining (EDM) technology in post-processing metal AM components. Most of the metal AM alloys used in industries are of difficult-to-cut in nature due to high hardness.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%