2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.electacta.2015.02.029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electrochemical degradation of chloramphenicol with a novel Al doped PbO2 electrode: Performance, kinetics and degradation mechanism

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

5
68
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 201 publications
(73 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
(37 reference statements)
5
68
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Even though a difference of 1.3% was recorded between the prediction and the actual result, the model can be considered as precise and valid. Although here we studied CAP removal with electrooxidation, in the study by Chen et al, (2015), 87.3% of CAP removal and 52.1% of mineralization (500 mg L −1 initial CAP concentration) was reached after 2.5 h electrolysis with 0.2 mol dm −3 of Na 2 SO 4 at a current density of 30 mA cm −2 and an Al/PbO 2 electrode. The corresponding half‐life was 49.8 min under these conditions.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Even though a difference of 1.3% was recorded between the prediction and the actual result, the model can be considered as precise and valid. Although here we studied CAP removal with electrooxidation, in the study by Chen et al, (2015), 87.3% of CAP removal and 52.1% of mineralization (500 mg L −1 initial CAP concentration) was reached after 2.5 h electrolysis with 0.2 mol dm −3 of Na 2 SO 4 at a current density of 30 mA cm −2 and an Al/PbO 2 electrode. The corresponding half‐life was 49.8 min under these conditions.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Treatment time and current intensity had the greatest effect on CAP removal, at 54.6 and 34.4%, respectively. The large effect of current intensity is a reflection of this parameter's control of the amount of OH − radicals and other oxidants produced in the reactor (Zaviska et al, 2013; García‐Gómez et al, 2014; Chen et al, 2015). However, the impact of the pollutant's initial concentration ( X 2 ) on the investigated response was relatively low (6.75%).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Some researchers [24,[40][41][42] assumed that Ti/SnO 2 and Ti/PbO 2 were considered as non-active electrodes comparing to Ti/RuO 2 or Ti/ IrO 2 . However, according to our previous comparisons, the Ti/PbO 2 electrode was more active compared with Ti/SnO 2 electrode in this experiment [43].…”
Section: Aniline Removal and Its Biodegradabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are some kinds of AOPs have been researched, such as photo-catalysis [5], photoelectro-catalysis [6,7] and electrocatalysis [8], of which electro-catalysis has the characteristics of low requirement to the equipments and reaction condition, simple operation, and the generation of some high active species like hydrogen peroxide (H 2 O 2 ) [9,10] and hydroxyl radical ( OH) [11] produced on the surface of the electrodes to degrade organic contaminants effectively. However, most advanced electrochemical oxidation process (AEOP), one of new AOPs, treated high concentration organic wastewater [12][13][14][15], their high current and high voltage will consume more energy sources, what's more, in the condition of high current density, many by-products will be generated when degrading the organic wastewater [16][17][18]. Thus, it's a promising choice to catalyze and oxidate the low concentration organics with low voltage.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%