Electrochemical bacterial detection using poly(3-aminophenylboronic acid)-based imprinted polymer

Golabi, Mohsen; Kuralay, Filiz; Jager, Edwin; Beni, Valerio; Turner, Anthony

doi:10.1016/j.bios.2016.09.088

Cited by 125 publications

(71 citation statements)

References 66 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…3b (Golabi et al 2017). Despite the absence of a highly selective molecular biorecognition element, CIPs and MIPs exhibit selectivity when exposed to samples that contain multiple analytes (i.e., non-target species) (Golabi et al 2017;Jafari et al 2019;Qi et al 2013). MIPs and CIPs are also of interest with regard to opportunities in biosensor regeneration.…”

Section: Cell-and Molecularly-imprinted Polymersmentioning

confidence: 99%

Electrochemical biosensors for pathogen detection

Cesewski

Johnson

2020

Biosensors and Bioelectronics

555

358

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

A B S T R A C TRecent advances in electrochemical biosensors for pathogen detection are reviewed. Electrochemical biosensors for pathogen detection are broadly reviewed in terms of transduction elements, biorecognition elements, electrochemical techniques, and biosensor performance. Transduction elements are discussed in terms of electrode material and form factor. Biorecognition elements for pathogen detection, including antibodies, aptamers, and imprinted polymers, are discussed in terms of availability, production, and immobilization approach. Emerging areas of electrochemical biosensor design are reviewed, including electrode modification and transducer integration. Measurement formats for pathogen detection are classified in terms of sample preparation and secondary binding steps. Applications of electrochemical biosensors for the detection of pathogens in food and water safety, medical diagnostics, environmental monitoring, and bio-threat applications are highlighted. Future directions and challenges of electrochemical biosensors for pathogen detection are discussed, including wearable and conformal biosensors, detection of plant pathogens, multiplexed detection, reusable biosensors for process monitoring applications, and low-cost, disposable biosensors.

show abstract

Section: Cell-and Molecularly-imprinted Polymersmentioning

confidence: 99%

Electrochemical biosensors for pathogen detection

Cesewski

Johnson

2020

Biosensors and Bioelectronics

555

358

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…[47] Theb io-recognition elementc an therebyb ea na ntibody, [48] aptamer, [47] RNA [49] or polymer. [50] Most recently,t he integration of nanotubes [51,52] andn anoparticles in EISb iosensorsh as been reported previously. [53][54][55] As an example, an ovel andm ultifunctional sensor fort he simultaneous detection, eliminationa nd inactivation of bacteria wasr eportedb yY ange tal.…”

Section: Nanomaterial-basedimpedimetric Biosensorsmentioning

confidence: 87%

“…Once the target bacteria bind to the recognition probe, the impedance at the interface changes and consequently the target bacteria are quantified based on this change . The bio‐recognition element can thereby be an antibody, aptamer, RNA or polymer . Most recently, the integration of nanotubes and nanoparticles in EIS biosensors has been reported previously .…”

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

Electrochemical Detection of Pathogenic Bacteria—Recent Strategies, Advances and Challenges

Kuss

Amin

Compton

2018

Chemistry An Asian Journal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Bacterial infections represent one of the leading causes of mortality worldwide, nevertheless the design and development of rapid, cost-efficient and reliable detection methods for pathogens remains challenging. In recent years, electrochemical sensing methods have gained increasing attention for the detection of pathogenic bacteria, due to their increasingly competitive sensitivity. However, combining sensitivity with cost efficiency, high selectivity and a facile working procedure in a portable device is difficult. The presented review provides a summary of biosensing strategies for bacteria, published since 2015, by covering significant achievements towards custom-designed portable point-of-care devices. Herein, the direct chemical recognition of bacteria via enzyme activity or secretion products, as well as their detection at various electrode surfaces and materials, such as nanomaterials, indium tin oxide or paper-based immunosensors, is discussed. Furthermore, newly established hyphenated sensing principles, incorporated into lab-on-a-chip and microfluidic devices, are presented and remaining technical challenges and limitations are considered.

show abstract

“…In addition, the availability of imprinting sites on the bacteria imprinting polymers (BIPs) is another critical factor for efficient bacterial imprinting. Surface imprinting, including several typical methods, such as sol–gel, lithography, micro‐contact imprinting, Pickering emulsion, and colloidal imprinting, have been developed, which can ensure the effective diffusion of these large targets from the cavity.…”

Section: Biological Molecular Imprinting With Different Scalementioning

confidence: 99%

Molecularly Imprinted Materials for Selective Biological Recognition

Zhang

et al. 2019

Macromol. Rapid Commun.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Molecular imprinting is an approach of generating imprinting cavities in polymer structures that are compatible with the target molecules. The cavities have memory for shape and chemical recognition, similar to the recognition mechanism of antigen–antibody in organisms. Their structures are also called biomimetic receptors or synthetic receptors. Owing to the excellent selectivity and unique structural predictability of molecularly imprinted materials (MIMs), practical MIMs have become a rapidly evolving research area providing key factors for understanding separation, recognition, and regenerative properties toward biological small molecules to biomacromolecules, even cell and microorganism. In this review, the characteristics, morphologies, and applicability of currently popular carrier materials for molecular imprinting, especially the fundamental role of hydrogels, porous materials, hierarchical nanoparticles, and 2D materials in the separation and recognition of biological templates are discussed. Moreover, through a series of case studies, emphasis is given on introducing imprinting strategies for biological templates with different molecular scales. In particular, the differences and connections between small molecular imprinting (bulk imprinting, “dummy” template imprinting, etc.), large molecular imprinting (surface imprinting, interfacial imprinting, etc.), and cell imprinting strategies are demonstrated in detail. Finally, future research directions are provided.

show abstract

Electrochemical bacterial detection using poly(3-aminophenylboronic acid)-based imprinted polymer

Cited by 125 publications

References 66 publications

Electrochemical biosensors for pathogen detection

Electrochemical biosensors for pathogen detection

Electrochemical Detection of Pathogenic Bacteria—Recent Strategies, Advances and Challenges

Molecularly Imprinted Materials for Selective Biological Recognition

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About