2021
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-00910-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electroceutical fabric lowers zeta potential and eradicates coronavirus infectivity upon contact

Abstract: Coronavirus with intact infectivity attached to PPE surfaces pose significant threat to the spread of COVID-19. We tested the hypothesis that an electroceutical fabric, generating weak potential difference of 0.5 V, disrupts the infectivity of coronavirus upon contact by destabilizing the electrokinetic properties of the virion. Porcine respiratory coronavirus AR310 particles (105) were placed in direct contact with the fabric for 1 or 5 min. Following one minute of contact, zeta potential of the porcine coron… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Another useful characteristic that reflects the total charge of a viral particle, its adsorption properties, and stability in dispersion is the zeta potential. The average zeta potential of the porcine coronavirus dispersed in double-distilled water was determined to be −25.675 mV [40]. However, zeta potential measurements require concentrated viral suspensions and are not applicable to intact pathogenic viruses.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another useful characteristic that reflects the total charge of a viral particle, its adsorption properties, and stability in dispersion is the zeta potential. The average zeta potential of the porcine coronavirus dispersed in double-distilled water was determined to be −25.675 mV [40]. However, zeta potential measurements require concentrated viral suspensions and are not applicable to intact pathogenic viruses.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The particle removal efficacy studies did not include a hygiene protocol to elute collected aerosol particles from the collector plates once removal had taken place. Theoretically, a virus captured in this manner (electrostatically) would dehydrate and be rendered inactive, and although this study did not include a laboratory demonstration of this effect, previous studies using electrically charged surfaces illustrate the capacity for the deactivation of a virus [26]. Similarly, the mEP respirator required a continuous power source for functionality and performance, and although airflow was not restricted when the mEP unit was not powered, the benefits of particle removal dissipated.…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…(h & i) Eradication of respiratory coronavirus (CoV) subjected to contact with the charged mask for 5 ​min, which indicates that the effectiveness of the cartridge improves from 85% to approximately 95%. Reproduced with permission [ 206 ], Copyright 2021, Springer Nature. …”
Section: Current Health Problems and Their Potential E-textile Solutionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ghatak et al. developed an electric facemask using electroceutical fabric to kill coronaviruses that come into contact with the mask [ 206 ]. This electroceutical fabric mask was first tested against a pig coronavirus and then on a human coronavirus that causes the common cold or fever.…”
Section: Current Health Problems and Their Potential E-textile Solutionsmentioning
confidence: 99%