1955
DOI: 10.1136/sti.31.4.238
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electrocardiographic Changes in Reiter's Syndrome

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1957
1957
1975
1975

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…ST segment elevation of pericarditis, with or without clinical evidence, has been described by Csonka and others (1961), Paronen (1948), and Mayne (1955).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…ST segment elevation of pericarditis, with or without clinical evidence, has been described by Csonka and others (1961), Paronen (1948), and Mayne (1955).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…There was no follow-up of these cases and the clinical evidence ,does not justify the claims made. Later some clinicians used electrocardiography as a routine investigation in Reiter's disease, and abnormal tracings were reported in a fairly high proportion of cases (Master and Jaffe, 1934;Gadrat and Morel, 1935;Candel and Wheelock, 1945;Feiring, 1946;Warthin, 1948;Lovgren and Masreliez, 1949;Shapiro et al, 1949;Trier, 1950;Weinberger et al, 1952;Mayne, 1955). The most constant finding was a prolonged P-R interval and sometimes there was a flattening of the T wave.…”
Section: Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cardiac involvement in the acute stages of Reiter's disease has been described by several authors in recent years (Feiring, 1946;Warthin, 1948;Trier, 1950;Mayne, 1955;Csonka and Oates, 1957;Neu, Reider, and Mack, 1960;Weinberger and others, 1962), the most common findings being a prolongation of the PR interval with variable flattening of the T wave. Paronen (1948) published his observations on 344 post-dysenteric cases of Reiter's disease and there were twenty subjects with abnormal electrocardiograms out of 308 patients examined in this way (6-5 per cent.…”
mentioning
confidence: 94%