Electroanalytical Methods for the Determination of Pharmaceuticals: A Review of Recent Trends and Developments

Uslu, Bengi

doi:10.1080/00032719.2011.553010

Cited by 127 publications

(46 citation statements)

References 298 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…In pulse methods the procedures are based on the application of pulse changes of potential, and the current response is measured at a suitable time relative to the time of the pulse [115].…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Electrochemical virus detections with nanobiosensors

Kaya

Karadurmuş

Özçelikay

et al. 2020

Nanosensors for Smart Cities

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Electrochemical virus detections with nanobiosensors

Kaya

Karadurmuş

Özçelikay

et al. 2020

Nanosensors for Smart Cities

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Linear pH dependence of the peak potential for reduction wave clearly shows that the proton participates directly in the reduction process carried out at GCE ( Figure 5A and B). [17][18][19] The relation between E p of the reduction wave and pH over the range 7.0-12. …”

Section: Effect Of Phmentioning

confidence: 99%

Electrochemical behavior and assay of anti-Parkinson drug selegiline using cathodic adsorptive stripping square wave voltammetry in bulk form

Sinha¹,

Shekhawat²,

Sharma³

2015

RIE

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract:The electrochemical reduction behavior of selegiline was investigated by cyclic voltammetry using glassy carbon electrode and validated by square wave cathodic adsorptive stripping voltammetry. Selegiline gave one well-defined reduction peak in the potential range −0.4 to −0.5 V versus Ag/AgCl electrode. The reduction process is irreversible and partial diffusion controlled. Various chemical and instrumental parameters affecting the electroanalytical response for the determination of selegiline were investigated and optimized. Under optimized conditions, the adsorptive stripping peak current is found to be linear over the concentration range of 3.0×10 −7 -2.5×10−5 M with a detection limit of 3.04×10 −8 M and a lower limit of quantification of 1.01×10 −7 M.

show abstract

“…Application of this electrode material in electroanalysis of organic compounds has been reviewed e.g. in [22][23][24][25][26][27]. The newer and perspective trends include miniaturization of BDD sensors for their utilization in in vivo/in vitro analysis or for detection in capillary electrophoresis or micro total analytical systems [24,28,29], utilization of adsorptive techniques in the presence of surfactant interacting with organic analytes, which increases the selectivity and sensitivity of proposed methods [30,31], or modification of BDD surfaces and their utilizations in construction of BDD-based sensors (for details, see [32,33]).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%