2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.sna.2014.03.033
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electroanalytical method for the determination of methylparaben

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0
3

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
12
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The plot of square root of scan rate with the peak current showed a linear relationship in the range of 10 to 50 mV s -1 which is of diffusion controlled process [21].…”
Section: Influence Of Scan Ratementioning
confidence: 85%
“…The plot of square root of scan rate with the peak current showed a linear relationship in the range of 10 to 50 mV s -1 which is of diffusion controlled process [21].…”
Section: Influence Of Scan Ratementioning
confidence: 85%
“…A selectivity study of both rGO and CNC–rGO nanocomposite modified electrodes for MP determination was carried out using a few possible interference substances such as ascorbic acid, benzoic acid, salicylic acid, and citric acid. Ascorbic acid was selected because it is an electroactive species [66], while salicylic acid, benzoic acid, and citric acid may be present in pharmaceutical formulations [67,68,69,70,71]. As can be seen in Figure 8, several common interfering species displayed a much lower current response at potential 0.75 V, while salicylic acid showed a significant peak at potential 0.85 V. Both rGO and CNC-rGO nanocomposite modified electrodes exhibited an almost similar current trend with a slightly higher current in salicylic acid solution.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Where I pa refers to the anodic peak current, n is the number of electrons transferred, A 0 is the surface area of the electrode, D 0 is the diffusion coefficient, υ is the scan rate (V.s −1 ) and C 0 is the concentration of K 4 Fe (CN) 6 . For 1.0 mM K 4 Fe (CN) 6 , n=1, D o =7.6×10 −6 cm 2 s −1 , then from the slope of the plot of I pa vs. υ 1/2 , the electro‐active area was calculated . In our experiment, electro‐active areas of GPE and GCE were found to be 0.2207 and 0.118 cm 2 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%