2009 International Workshop on Junction Technology 2009
DOI: 10.1109/iwjt.2009.5166220
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electrical transport characterization of nano CMOS devices with ultra-thin silicon film

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This could be interpreted as an increasing contribution of scattering mechanisms in shorter devices (below 70 -80nm), possibly due to neutral defects. These defects may originate from source-drain implantation-induced Si interstitials in undoped film and halo extra doping in bulk architectures 57 . Finally, the backscattering coefficient r has been extracted using Eq.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This could be interpreted as an increasing contribution of scattering mechanisms in shorter devices (below 70 -80nm), possibly due to neutral defects. These defects may originate from source-drain implantation-induced Si interstitials in undoped film and halo extra doping in bulk architectures 57 . Finally, the backscattering coefficient r has been extracted using Eq.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It should be noted that the threshold voltages of these devices are almost the same all the way down to 50 nm with slight RSCE for channel lengths below � 120 nm due to halo implants. In bulk devices, it is already known that flMRlin reduction at short channel length is due to mobility deg radation due to halo implants, neutral defects, remote Coulomb scattering (RCS) and to a smaller extent ballistic transport [21,22,27]. The origin of this degradation is similar to that of the effective mobility.…”
Section: It Measurement and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One may argue that a second order dependence on GS may be responsible for the nonlinearity of the Y-function as mentioned in [38] and more recently by Cros et al [5]. This approach was efficient for a very thin gate oxide (<10 nm) where interface scattering is a dominant issue such that the mobility is found to be more degraded at the top interface than at the bottom interface, indicating that defects are more numerous at the top channel region [39]. But in our case, due to the relative thick oxide layer of our devices (25 nm), the latter consideration is not relevant so we could limit our analysis to the first order dependence for moderate values of GS .…”
Section: Behavior Of the Low Field Mobility At Low Temperaturementioning
confidence: 89%