2020
DOI: 10.1088/1361-6528/ab5fed
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electrical/thermal behaviors of bimetallic (Ag–Cu, Ag–Sn) nanoparticles for printed electronics

Abstract: In this work, Ag-Cu and Ag-Sn nanoparticles (NPs) were synthesized by a physical vapor condensation method, i.e. DC arc-discharge plasma. The as-prepared bimetallic nanoparticles consist of metallic cores of Ag-Cu or Ag-Sn and ultrathin oxide shells of CuO or a hybrid of SnO and SnO2. Ag-Sn NPs exhibit a room temperature resistivity of 4.24×10 -5 Ω•cm, a little lower than 7.10×10 -5 Ω•cm of Ag-Cu NPs. Both bimetallic nanoparticles demonstrate a typical metallic conduction behavior with a positive temperature c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Due to the alloy feature, the conductivity of PPy-PtPd was worse than that of PPy-Pt. 36 As shown in Figure 4C, the peaks at −0.5 V in the DPV were consistent with the results in CV and EIS. Although there was an observable peak for PPy, the catalytic effects of PPy on H 2 O 2 was low (Figure 4D).…”
Section: 31supporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Due to the alloy feature, the conductivity of PPy-PtPd was worse than that of PPy-Pt. 36 As shown in Figure 4C, the peaks at −0.5 V in the DPV were consistent with the results in CV and EIS. Although there was an observable peak for PPy, the catalytic effects of PPy on H 2 O 2 was low (Figure 4D).…”
Section: 31supporting
confidence: 88%
“…The R ct difference between PPy-Pt and PPy-Pd may be explained by the morphological variety. Due to the alloy feature, the conductivity of PPy-PtPd was worse than that of PPy-Pt . As shown in Figure C, the peaks at −0.5 V in the DPV were consistent with the results in CV and EIS.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…17 Wang et al used the physical vapour condensation approach to synthesize Ag-Sn nanoparticles in which spherical Ag 3 Sn nanoparticles were obtained along with Sn with a size of 64 nm. 12 Besides that, the galvanic displacement method has been used to synthesize the Ag-Sn intermetallic core with a SnO 2 shell, 14,26 and the Ag 3 Sn/Ag 4 Sn intermetallic shell with the core of Sn nanoparticles. 27 Most of the reports either show the appearance of the β-Sn phase along with the Ag-Sn intermetallic phase and/ or a broad range of size distributions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…10 Sn is an abundant and inexpensive element which not only enhances the performance of the corresponding monometallic nanocrystals into which it is incorporated but also reduces the overall cost of the material. Among the Sn-based intermetallics, the Ag–Sn system has potential applications as lead-free solders, 11 inkjet printing materials, 12 and electrode materials for Li-ion batteries. 13 Recently, Ag–Sn based intermetallic nanomaterials have also attracted considerable attention as electrocatalysts for CO 2 reduction, oxygen reduction and borohydride oxidation reactions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, both the electrical transport and the critical field were greatly size related. [ 21 ] In our previous work, the superconductive phenomenon was also found in multiwalled carbon nanotube‐coated Sn nanoparticles (Sn@CNT) [ 22 ] and bimetallic Ag–Sn nanoparticles, [ 23 ] even though they are completely coated by dielectric layers of CNTs and SnO/SnO 2 , respectively.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%