The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2019
DOI: 10.1038/s41586-019-0923-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electrical resistivity across a nematic quantum critical point

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

24
108
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 118 publications
(134 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
24
108
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This value however differs from that reported in Ref. [33], where the nominal concentrations have been used. For example, in Ref [33] xnom = 0.16 has Ts ∼ 51 K, which would correspond to x ∼ 0.13, based on our phase diagram and previous reports [3,17].…”
Section: Footnotescontrasting
confidence: 89%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…This value however differs from that reported in Ref. [33], where the nominal concentrations have been used. For example, in Ref [33] xnom = 0.16 has Ts ∼ 51 K, which would correspond to x ∼ 0.13, based on our phase diagram and previous reports [3,17].…”
Section: Footnotescontrasting
confidence: 89%
“…[33], however, it was assumed to occur near the nematic critical point defined as x nom ∼ 0.16, which corresponds to x ∼ 0.13 in our phase diagrams in Fig.3 and Fig.S1(b) (as the resistivity derivative in Ref. [33] show a T s ∼ 51 K). At low temperatures, we observe that Fermi-liquid behaviour recovers in the tetragonal phase (see also Refs.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 3 more Smart Citations