2016
DOI: 10.1021/acsnano.5b07942
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electrical Properties of Synthesized Large-Area MoS2 Field-Effect Transistors Fabricated with Inkjet-Printed Contacts

Abstract: We report the electrical properties of synthesized large-area monolayer molybdenum disulfide (MoS2) field-effect transistors (FETs) with low-cost inkjet-printed Ag electrodes. The monolayer MoS2 film was grown by a chemical vapor deposition (CVD) method, and the top-contact Ag source/drain electrodes (S/D) were deposited onto the films using a low-cost drop-on-demand inkjet-printing process without any masks and surface treatments. The electrical characteristics of FETs were comparable to those fabricated by c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

6
53
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
6
53
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The hydrophobicity is impeded if the MoS 2 is slightly defective (CA % 70 ) [50] or if the sample is made of microsized particles (CA % 75 ). [51] These observations are consistent with the differences in CA measured inside the friction track after 3 and 150 cycles of friction (CA % 60 ) and outside the friction track (CA % 74 ) (Table 1). Indeed, the inside is shown to be comprised of a MoS x O y material, while the outside shows higher detection of Mo 2 S 3 À molecular ions and lower detection of MoS x O y À molecular ions (Table 1).…”
Section: Work Of Adhesionsupporting
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The hydrophobicity is impeded if the MoS 2 is slightly defective (CA % 70 ) [50] or if the sample is made of microsized particles (CA % 75 ). [51] These observations are consistent with the differences in CA measured inside the friction track after 3 and 150 cycles of friction (CA % 60 ) and outside the friction track (CA % 74 ) (Table 1). Indeed, the inside is shown to be comprised of a MoS x O y material, while the outside shows higher detection of Mo 2 S 3 À molecular ions and lower detection of MoS x O y À molecular ions (Table 1).…”
Section: Work Of Adhesionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…[49][50][51]54] In general, when the CA is low, W should be high. [49][50][51]54] In general, when the CA is low, W should be high.…”
Section: Work Of Adhesionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The extracted values of τ and β were 4.1 × 10 5 s, ≈0.33 under PBS and 8.2 × 10 4 s, ≈0.37 under NBS, respectively. The carrier trapping time of the ionic gating MoS 2 transistor showed a long trapping time (≈10 5 s) compared with that of the previously reported MoS 2 transistors (≈10 3 s) . High carrier trapping time implies that relatively less V th shift occurs under the same stress conditions.…”
mentioning
confidence: 60%
“…[409] The viscosity of Ag inks is tuned by adjusting the nanoparticle or binder concentrations to meet the requirements of a variety of printing methods including inkjet printing, [255] aerosol-jet printing, [255] pen writing,, [398] screen printing, [260] gravure printing, [259] and direct-write (3D) printing. [259,260,410,411] The contact resistances of printed Ag electrodes are typically higher than those achieved by vacuum-based evaporation, due to Ag oxidation during annealing and the reduced contact area that results from the roughness of the printed electrodes. [259,260,410,411] The contact resistances of printed Ag electrodes are typically higher than those achieved by vacuum-based evaporation, due to Ag oxidation during annealing and the reduced contact area that results from the roughness of the printed electrodes.…”
Section: Electrically Conductive Nanomaterials Inksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[269] Ag inks have proven to be effective materials for fabricating electrical contacts in a variety of FET structures. [410,412] In particular, inkjet-printed Ag electrodes typically have a contact resistance of 1.8 MΩ cm in comparison to 0.55 MΩ cm for evaporated Ag electrodes in the bottom-contact geometry. [410,412] In particular, inkjet-printed Ag electrodes typically have a contact resistance of 1.8 MΩ cm in comparison to 0.55 MΩ cm for evaporated Ag electrodes in the bottom-contact geometry.…”
Section: Electrically Conductive Nanomaterials Inksmentioning
confidence: 99%