2006
DOI: 10.1093/treephys/26.9.1113
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electrical measurement of tree root absorbing surfaces by the earth impedance method: 2. Verification based on allometric relationships and root severing experiments

Abstract: We validated, by means of allometric relationships and root severing experiments, the modified earth impedance method developed for measuring absorbing root surfaces. For the allometric studies, a series of 350 small and large trees of six broadleaf and coniferous species in several experimental sites was examined. We found a good linear ln-ln fit between absorbing root surface area and basal area (or stem cross-sectional area at the root collar in seedlings) over a range of stem diameters from 0.5-55 cm. The … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
32
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
2
32
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Under such conditions, the assessment of root size by root resistance is liable to be less accurate than an assessment made with regard to root capacitance. This, in turn, tends to agree with previous studies where the capacitance method was applied more widely in the assessment of root size (Chloupek, 1972, 1977; Dalton, 1995; van Beem et al , 1998; Preston et al , 2004; Rajkai et al , 2005; McBride et al , 2008) than was the resistance method (Aubrecht et al , 2006; Čermák et al , 2006). …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Under such conditions, the assessment of root size by root resistance is liable to be less accurate than an assessment made with regard to root capacitance. This, in turn, tends to agree with previous studies where the capacitance method was applied more widely in the assessment of root size (Chloupek, 1972, 1977; Dalton, 1995; van Beem et al , 1998; Preston et al , 2004; Rajkai et al , 2005; McBride et al , 2008) than was the resistance method (Aubrecht et al , 2006; Čermák et al , 2006). …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…In the course of several studies, single-frequency alternating current was applied in order to assess the capacitance or resistance of the root system, since those attributes were assumed to provide a measurement of the active root surface area (Walker, 1965; Chloupek, 1972, 1977; Dalton, 1995; Preston et al , 2004; Aubrecht et al , 2006; Čermák et al , 2006; McBride et al , 2008). A form of single-frequency (128 Hz) measurement, the earth impedance method, was introduced to estimate the absorbing root surface area in the field (Aubrecht et al , 2006; Čermák et al , 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The most innovative aspect was the possibility of calculating the absorbing root surface area (ARSA) of individual mature trees, even though ARSA was anatomically not defined. Based on mathematically derived equations, the method was verified on allometric relationships (Čermák et al , 2006) and recently applied by Butler et al (2010). Basic assumptions, tacitly assumed to apply for the EIM, however, were not tested experimentally even though similar approaches clearly indicated extensive methodological limitations (Chloupek, 1972; Dvořák et al , 1981; Kendall et al , 1982; Dalton, 1995; Ozier-Lafontaine and Bajazet, 2005; Cao et al , 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An exception is the impact of eventual anastomosis, which may simulate higher absorptive root area than would correspond to DBH. This method was tested in 12 woody species with a range of diameters (0.5 to 55 cm - Cermák et al 2006;and 0.5 to 120 cm, Cermák & Nadezhdina 2011c) and applied in practically oriented studies (Butler et al 2010, Simon & Cermák 2011. It can also be modified by the application of electrical impedance spectroscopy (Repo et al 2005, Cao et al 2010a, 2010b.…”
Section: Absorptive Root Area -Via the Modified Earth Impedance Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%