2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2005.01.029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electrical coupling in proton exchange membrane fuel cell stacks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
40
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
2
40
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As such, the terminology "pseudo-2D" is often used to describe 1 + 1D unit-cell models. The simplicity of 1 + 1D unit-cell models allowed describing coupling between different unit cells, leading to stack model [15][16][17]. In the present study we develop a model that considers local, two-dimensional crosssections together with the transport along the channel.…”
Section: Reduced-dimensional Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As such, the terminology "pseudo-2D" is often used to describe 1 + 1D unit-cell models. The simplicity of 1 + 1D unit-cell models allowed describing coupling between different unit cells, leading to stack model [15][16][17]. In the present study we develop a model that considers local, two-dimensional crosssections together with the transport along the channel.…”
Section: Reduced-dimensional Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their predictions revealed that varying the flow channel path length over the same reaction area and channel/rib cross section dimensions can affect the performance and uniformity in both single cells and stacks. For the stack model, St-Pierre and co-workers [9][10][11] improved the simple mathematical model with a 1D + 1D approach. Their model was computationally undemanding and allowed for unlimited cells to be in the simulated stack.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even though many researchers have been studying the impact of different parameters on stack performance [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17], a standard methodology to improve the stack design is not available. This methodology should be specific to the typical stack design (e.g., short stack (10-300 W) for portable devices, medium stack (0.3-5 kW) for residential stationary applications, and large stack (30-50 kW) for automotive applications such as fuel cell hybrid and battery dominated fuel cell hybrid vehicles).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our group began with a basic unit cell model of this type [4], using several sets of experimental data for fitting and validation. To this model were added the effects of electrical coupling between unit cells in a stack environment ( [3] with validation against experimental results in [18]). Also added were simple models to describe the temperature variations through the MEA and bipolar plates and the increase in coolant temperature in each cell in a fuel cell stack [38,29].…”
Section: Membranementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several elements of the model described below have been developed previously: a basic, reduced dimensional unit cell model in [4] with experimental fitting and validation of water crossover and effects of cathode low inlet humidity, simple versions of the thermal model [38,29], the electrical coupling through bipolar plate resistance [3] and its experimental validation [18]. Below, these elements are brought together into a common model with full coupling between them.…”
Section: Stack Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%