2011
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.84.115428
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electric field reduced charging energies and two-electron bound excited states of single donors in silicon

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
33
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
1
33
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Simple electrostatic arguments for tip-induced band bending were employed 51 , identical to those describing metal-oxide-semiconductor capacitors. We find that the D 0 state is measured in a regime E z = (−0.3±1.9) MV/m, well below the field ∼ 20 MV/m theoretically predicted to contribute to coherent valley de-population for an arsenic donor ∼ 3 nm from an interface 52 . These electrostatic arguments were independently validated by extracting the vacuum tunneling barrier energy 37,53,54 from measured variation dI/dz in the tunnel current I with tip height z in Figure A.…”
Section: Electric Field Experienced By Donormentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Simple electrostatic arguments for tip-induced band bending were employed 51 , identical to those describing metal-oxide-semiconductor capacitors. We find that the D 0 state is measured in a regime E z = (−0.3±1.9) MV/m, well below the field ∼ 20 MV/m theoretically predicted to contribute to coherent valley de-population for an arsenic donor ∼ 3 nm from an interface 52 . These electrostatic arguments were independently validated by extracting the vacuum tunneling barrier energy 37,53,54 from measured variation dI/dz in the tunnel current I with tip height z in Figure A.…”
Section: Electric Field Experienced By Donormentioning
confidence: 94%
“…26) compared with the 44-meV experimental value. 27 The method is described in detail in Supplementary Information.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…26) compared with the 44-meV experimental value. 27 The method is described in detail in Supplementary Information.The FCI technique is an exact way to solve the multi-electron problem only limited by the number of one-electron basis functions used. The method diagonalises the multi-electron Hamiltonian in the basis of all Slater determinants constructed from the single-electron states of the system.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By understanding the effects of modulations in the doping density including effects of both the spin density as well as the doping potential, allows now calculations which probe the readout properties of the qubits, especially using techniques such as EDMR [34,35,[53][54][55]. Additionally, alternative qubits such as excited-state dopants [59] or charged dopant qubits [57,[60][61][62] can now be explored with this accurate picture of the electronic structure.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The non-spherical nature of the doping potential will be important for calculation of electron-dopant scattering cross sections. Effective mass models of doped silicon assume a spherical Coulomb potential, while some tight binding models use a spherical, Coulomb-like doping potential [28,29,56,57] and allow the surrounding atoms' electronic structure to adjust according to this potential. The anisotropic doping potentials and cell geometries calculated here could be used as alternative parameterizations for tight binding models, and they can also be used to calibrate the resulting potentials and densities calculated by tight binding models.…”
Section: A Doping Potentialmentioning
confidence: 99%