2007
DOI: 10.1063/1.2773748
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electric-current-driven vortex-core reversal in soft magnetic nanodots

Abstract: Articles you may be interested inRadial-spin-wave-mode-assisted vortex-core magnetization reversals Appl. Phys. Lett. 100, 172413 (2012) Effect of the classical ampere field in micromagnetic computations of spin polarized current-driven magnetization processes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
73
3
2

Year Published

2007
2007
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 94 publications
(80 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
73
3
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The final state is then a CCW circular vortex with negative polarity (see Supplemental Material MOVIE 4 for an example of the switching process at J MTJ =5MA/cm 2 ). This switching process is different from previous mechanisms reported in literature involving edge solitons [40], gyrotropic motion [41], or vortexantivortex pairs [42]. , where K B is the Boltzmann constant, ΔV is the volume of the computational cubic cell, Δt is the simulation time step, T is the temperature of the sample, and χ is a three-dimensional white Gaussian noise with zero mean and unit variance, and it is uncorrelated for each computational cell [5,6].…”
contrasting
confidence: 44%
“…The final state is then a CCW circular vortex with negative polarity (see Supplemental Material MOVIE 4 for an example of the switching process at J MTJ =5MA/cm 2 ). This switching process is different from previous mechanisms reported in literature involving edge solitons [40], gyrotropic motion [41], or vortexantivortex pairs [42]. , where K B is the Boltzmann constant, ΔV is the volume of the computational cubic cell, Δt is the simulation time step, T is the temperature of the sample, and χ is a three-dimensional white Gaussian noise with zero mean and unit variance, and it is uncorrelated for each computational cell [5,6].…”
contrasting
confidence: 44%
“…[9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20] For instance, the current-driven vortex gyrotropic oscillation [9][10][11][12][13] and vortex core ͑VC͒ M switching [14][15][16][17][18][19][20] in confined magnetic systems have been observed both experimentally [9][10][11]13,14 and numerically. 12,[15][16][17][18][19][20] Despite the several studies conducted on the STT effect on such vortex excitations, quantitative understanding of the Oersted field ͑OH͒ effect of the spinpolarized currents has been lacking, even though this type of field has been reported to make sizable contributions to M reversals 5,21,22 and VC oscillations. 9,10,13 In this letter, we report the observation of sizable shifts in the intrinsic eigenfrequency D = ͑1 / 2 ͒ , of vortex gyrotropic motions in a laterally confined thin-film nanodot.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The velocities of the defects do not typically exceed the core switching velocity of permalloy (340 ± 20 m/s) [37]. However, sometimes an exception occurs in antiparallel vortex-antivortex annihilations.…”
Section: B Defect Dynamics During Relaxationmentioning
confidence: 99%