Electoral Reform and Public Policy Outcomes in Thailand: The Politics of the 30-Baht Health Scheme

Abstract

How do changes in electoral rules affect the nature of public policy outcomes? The current evidence supporting institutional theories that answer this question stems almost entirely from quantitative cross-country studies, the data of which contain very little within-unit variation. Indeed, while there are many country-level accounts of how changes in electoral rules affect such phenomena as the number of parties or voter turnout, there are few studies of how electoral reform affects public policy outcomes. This article contributes to this latter endeavor by providing a detailed analysis of electoral reform and the public policy process in Thailand through an examination of the 1997 electoral reforms. Specifically, the author examines four aspects of policy-making: policy formulation, policy platforms, policy content, and policy outcomes. The article finds that candidates in the pre-1997 era campaigned on broad, generic platforms; parties had no independent means of technical policy expertise; the government targeted health resources to narrow geographic areas; and health was underprovided in Thai society. Conversely, candidates in the post-1997 era relied more on a strong, detailed national health policy; parties created mechanisms to formulate health policy independently; the government allocated health resources broadly to the entire nation through the introduction of a universal health care system, and health outcomes improved. The author attributes these changes in the policy process to the 1997 electoral reform, which increased both constituency breadth (the proportion of the population to which politicians were accountable) and majoritarianism.

An Elephant’s Graveyard? Democracy and Development in East Asia

“…By contrast, proportional electoral rules and parliamentary governments lean towards representativeness over efficiency since such governments are often burdened with holding together heterogeneous coalitions. 7 See respectively Hsieh (2008), Noble (2010), Rock (2015) and Selway (2011Selway ( , 2015.…”

Thaksin the Populist?

“…But scholars and commentators took to calling the TRT populist. Thaksin's policies included microfinance loans of one million baht per village, debt moratorium for farmers, and a landmark universal healthcare bill, known as the 30-baht scheme (McCargo and Ukrit 2005;Selway 2011Selway , 2015. Never before had a political party run on such ambitious and innovative policies.…”

“…But others dismiss this label, showing how his policies reached numerous social groups across Thailand (Pasuk and Baker 2002;Selway 2011Selway , 2015. In this paper, we turn to the academic definition of populism, which has less to do with policy or ideological leanings, and more to do with the underlying rhetoric or attitudes of a leader.…”

The Power of Living in the Present Moment among Patients with Diabetes

“…Since 1997, Thailand has had a national health policy with mechanisms to formulate health policy, and data on health systems and functioning has been gathered to generate evidence guided development of the policy and the design of the universal health care system (Selway, 2011). Health systems research stemmed from the field of health services that focus on promoting the coverage, quality, efficiency, and equity of health systems (Alliance for Health Policy and Systems Research [AHPSR], 2007) and public opinion research on the health system enhances benefits the population at large (Yingrengreung, Jinruang, & Kheokao, 2012).…”