2011
DOI: 10.1080/09718923.2011.11892914
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electoral Crisis, Governance and Democratic Consolidation in Nigeria

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Such factors include personalistic and ethnic politics as well as clientelism, where private goods are gifted to targeted groups based on ethnic ties or informal relationships in return for political support rather than the provision of public goods. Tetzlaff (2002) and Mbah (2011) likewise claim that parties in Africa are simply vehicles used by political entrepreneurs and elites to attain power, and are less about representing the different groups in society.…”
Section: Party Institutionalization and Ideological Delineationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such factors include personalistic and ethnic politics as well as clientelism, where private goods are gifted to targeted groups based on ethnic ties or informal relationships in return for political support rather than the provision of public goods. Tetzlaff (2002) and Mbah (2011) likewise claim that parties in Africa are simply vehicles used by political entrepreneurs and elites to attain power, and are less about representing the different groups in society.…”
Section: Party Institutionalization and Ideological Delineationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the commencement of the fourth republic on May 29, 1999, most Nigerians were full of great hope that the democratic experiment would enhance and entrench constitutionalism, respect for human rights, the rule of law, accountability, transparency, popular participation, and improve the economic wellbeing of the people [12] [13] . Implicit in the expectations is the recognition that the country"s previous experience with democratic governance failed to respond to the yearnings of majority of Nigerians.…”
Section: State Of Governance and National Security In The Fourth mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The high level of profligacy, lawlessness, fraud, blatant looting of national treasury, miscarriage of justice and impunity have constrained economic development, undermined popular trust in government and democratic institutions and subverted accountability and the rule of law [16] [13] . The resulting economic inequality continues to deepen social tensions, violence, and legitimacy crisis, with grave danger to national stability and security.…”
Section: State Of Governance and National Security In The Fourth mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, scholars often identify the existence of "vote buying" and the interplay of money and election gifting in Nigerian politics. They easily show scholarship by analyzing the scope of its existence, but fail to realize that members of the society (citizens), who collect money and gift items from politicians, are also part of the problem (Schaffer & Schedler, 2005;Alemika, 2007;Danjibo & Oladeji, 2007;Bratton, 2008;Ojo, 2008;Sha, 2008;Amadi, 2012;Inokoba & Kumokor, 2011;Lucky, 2013;Animashaun, 2015;Onapajo, 2015). The issue of vote buying however does not show the justification why citizens sell their conscience, but there is a realization that democracy in its true sense cannot be made to function in such manner if its dividends are expected to be seen in the Nigerian state.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%