2003
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd000104
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Elective high frequency oscillatory ventilation versus conventional ventilation for acute pulmonary dysfunction in preterm infants

Abstract: Analysis 1.2. Comparison 1 HFOV vs CV (all trials), Outcome 2 Mechanical ventilation at 28-30 days in survivors. Analysis 1.3. Comparison 1 HFOV vs CV (all trials), Outcome 3 Oxygen at 28-30 days in survivors.. .. .. . Analysis 1.4. Comparison 1 HFOV vs CV (all trials), Outcome 4 CLD at 28-30 days (O2 + xray) in survivors.. . Analysis 1.5. Comparison 1 HFOV vs CV (all trials), Outcome 5 Death or CLD at 28-30 days.. .. .. . .

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
54
0
2

Year Published

2005
2005
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
54
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…1 This is consistent with meta-analyses demonstrating that although there is no convincing benefit to elective high frequency ventilation, 17,18 there may possibly be some benefit with high frequency ventilation used for 'rescue' of infants with hypoxemic respiratory failure. 19,20 In summary, stepwise regression and CART models identified variables and the optimal cut points of the variables that are associated with death and/or physiologic BPD in premature infants with severe respiratory failure.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 54%
“…1 This is consistent with meta-analyses demonstrating that although there is no convincing benefit to elective high frequency ventilation, 17,18 there may possibly be some benefit with high frequency ventilation used for 'rescue' of infants with hypoxemic respiratory failure. 19,20 In summary, stepwise regression and CART models identified variables and the optimal cut points of the variables that are associated with death and/or physiologic BPD in premature infants with severe respiratory failure.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 54%
“…Therefore, one might expect that with HFOV important goals of lung protective ventilation (preventing physical injury due to repetitive closure and re-opening of alveoli) may be achieved. Most of the clinical HFOV studies were conducted in newborns with neonatal RDS; however, no clear benefit on mortality compared with conventional ventilation (CV) was observed [95][96][97][98][99].…”
Section: High-frequency Oscillatory Ventilationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Porém, nas últimas 2 décadas, vários estudos clínicos têm sido realizados, e os resultados continuam controversos [57][58][59][60][61][62][63][64][65] . Duas revisões feitas pela Cochrane Database não evidenciaram grandes vantagens do uso da ventilação de alta freqüência.…”
Section: Ventilação De Alta Freqüênciaunclassified
“…Duas revisões feitas pela Cochrane Database não evidenciaram grandes vantagens do uso da ventilação de alta freqüência. Alguns dos estudos incluídos mostraram uma discreta diminuição da incidência de DBP, enquanto que, em outros, houve um significante aumento da hemorragia intraventicular e da síndrome de extravasamento de ar 64,65 . Ao comparar a OAF com a ventilação mecânica convencional em recém-nascidos prematuros, os autores concluíram que a OAF não leva à redução da DBP ou da mortalidade, comparada à ventilação mecânica convencional, quando usada como tratamento inicial na SDR do prematuro extremo 64 .…”
Section: Ventilação De Alta Freqüênciaunclassified