1981
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.47.1436
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Elastic Scattering of 500-MeV Polarized Protons fromCa40,48,

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

1985
1985
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 134 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For Sn isotopes, although PC-PK1 slightly overestimates the neutron skin thickness in comparison with DD-PC1, it nicely reproduces the isotopic trend. For 208 Pb, all the interactions except DD-PC1 give similar neutron skin thicknesses which are larger than the data deduced from antiprotonic atoms [48], polarized proton scattering [49,50], elastic proton scattering [51], proton-nucleus elastic scattering [47], and agree within the experimental error bar with that from inelastic α scattering [52]. The slightly overestimated neutron skin thicknesses are due to the enhanced symmetry energies for nuclear matter shown in Table IV. In overall, the DD-PC1 parametrization provides better description of experimental charge radii and neutron skin thickness due to its smaller symmetry energy at saturation density.…”
Section: Charge Radii and Neutron Skin Thicknessessupporting
confidence: 55%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For Sn isotopes, although PC-PK1 slightly overestimates the neutron skin thickness in comparison with DD-PC1, it nicely reproduces the isotopic trend. For 208 Pb, all the interactions except DD-PC1 give similar neutron skin thicknesses which are larger than the data deduced from antiprotonic atoms [48], polarized proton scattering [49,50], elastic proton scattering [51], proton-nucleus elastic scattering [47], and agree within the experimental error bar with that from inelastic α scattering [52]. The slightly overestimated neutron skin thicknesses are due to the enhanced symmetry energies for nuclear matter shown in Table IV. In overall, the DD-PC1 parametrization provides better description of experimental charge radii and neutron skin thickness due to its smaller symmetry energy at saturation density.…”
Section: Charge Radii and Neutron Skin Thicknessessupporting
confidence: 55%
“…[24,25] and those by DD-PC1 [15], PC-F1 [11], PC-LA [10], and NL3* [28]. In the lower panel, the data for 208 Pb deduced from antiprotonic atoms [48], polarized proton scattering [49,50], elastic proton scattering [51], inelastic α scattering [52], and proton-nucleus elastic scattering [47] are shown from left to right respectively. PC-F1 is also included as dot-dashed line.…”
Section: Nuclear Excited Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several attempts have been made to determine neutron skin thickness. These include hadron scattering [18,19], π − scattering [20], antiprotonic atoms method [21,22], giant dipole resonance (GDR) method [23,24], spindipole resonance (SDR) method [25,26], Gamow-Teller resonance (GTR) method [27] etc. Almost all these methods are strongly model dependent due to the complexity of the strong interaction between nucleons.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We have analysed the bulk of the existing experimental data (mainly from LAMPF, IUCF and TRIUMF accelerators [8][9][10][11][12]) for elastic proton scattering at several energies: 160, 180, 200, 280, 400, ,489, 500 and 800 MeV, from two target nuclei, namely; 58 Ni and 90 Zr. The experimental data consists of , in all cases, the differential cross section and analysing power measurements at many scattering angles.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%