2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2006.12.048
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Elastic, inelastic, and path length fluctuations in jet tomography

Abstract: Jet quenching theory using perturbative QCD is extended to include (1) elastic as well as (2) inelastic parton energy losses and (3) jet path length fluctuations. The extended theory is applied to non-photonic single electron production in central Au+Au collisions at √ s = 200 AGeV. The three effects combine to significantly reduce the discrepancy between theory and current data without violating the global entropy bounds from multiplicity and elliptic flow data. We also check for consistency with the pion sup… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

19
680
4
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 492 publications
(710 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
19
680
4
1
Order By: Relevance
“…3 to the analytic formula (10). This comparison illustrates that sub-leading terms in E, which are not captured by (10), are reasonably small already for intermediate charm energies. It also shows that a potential dependence of the constant c(n f ) on the flow velocity β is suppressed at large energy, as anticipated in Section 2.…”
Section: Monte Carlo Simulation With Quantum Transition Ratesmentioning
confidence: 81%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…3 to the analytic formula (10). This comparison illustrates that sub-leading terms in E, which are not captured by (10), are reasonably small already for intermediate charm energies. It also shows that a potential dependence of the constant c(n f ) on the flow velocity β is suppressed at large energy, as anticipated in Section 2.…”
Section: Monte Carlo Simulation With Quantum Transition Ratesmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…The resulting (numerical) mean energy loss is compared in Fig. 3 to the analytic formula (10). This comparison illustrates that sub-leading terms in E, which are not captured by (10), are reasonably small already for intermediate charm energies.…”
Section: Monte Carlo Simulation With Quantum Transition Ratesmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…In order to single out contributions specific to collisional loss, we thus subtract from (5) the TM contribution. This is easily done by subtracting π sgn(ω) z s (k)δ(ω 2 − ω 2 s (k)) -which sets the gluons or plasmons on mass shell -from the spectral functions (2). Denoting −∆Ẽ andd ∞ the quantities of interest after this subtraction, we findd ∞ ≃ d∞ 2 for γ ≫ 1, i.e.…”
Section: Theoretical Framework and Critical Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3, right) [ 39,40] is in apparent conflict with the robust ∆E Q < ∆E q < ∆E g prediction of radiative energy loss models. In order to reproduce the high p T open charm/bottom suppression, jet quenching models require either initial gluon densities (dN g /dy ≈ 3000) inconsistent with those needed to describe the quenched light hadron spectra [ 41,42], or a smaller relative contribution of B relative to D mesons than theoretically expected in the measured decay electron p T range [ 38]. This discrepancy may point to an additional contribution from elastic (i.e.…”
Section: High P T Hadron Suppression → Dense Qgp With Dn G /Dy ∼ 1000mentioning
confidence: 98%