1999
DOI: 10.1088/0953-4075/32/12/320
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Elastic and total cross sections for electron-carbon disulfide collisions

Abstract: In this work, we report on a theoretical study of electron-CS2 collision in the low- and intermediate-energy range. More specifically, the elastic differential and integral cross sections as well as the grand total (elastic+inelastic) cross sections in the 0.05-100 eV range are reported. A complex optical potential consisting of static, exchange, correlation-polarization plus absorption contributions, derived from a fully molecular wavefunction, is used for the electron-molecule interaction. The Schwinger vari… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
17
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
5
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At 1.5 eV we see, as noted above, excellent agreement between the present experimental cross section and that of Sohn et al 27 The SVIM calculation of Lee et al 41 provides a good overall description of the shape of the DCS but it is generally higher in magnitude, with the exception of the most forward angles we see good agreement between this calculation and the data of Sohn et al 27 Perhaps not surprisingly, the IAM-SCAR calculation does not predict the DCS well at this energy, with a completely different angular dependence and magnitude at low angles. However, above about 100 • , this theory is in relatively good accord with experiment.…”
Section: B Cssupporting
confidence: 91%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…At 1.5 eV we see, as noted above, excellent agreement between the present experimental cross section and that of Sohn et al 27 The SVIM calculation of Lee et al 41 provides a good overall description of the shape of the DCS but it is generally higher in magnitude, with the exception of the most forward angles we see good agreement between this calculation and the data of Sohn et al 27 Perhaps not surprisingly, the IAM-SCAR calculation does not predict the DCS well at this energy, with a completely different angular dependence and magnitude at low angles. However, above about 100 • , this theory is in relatively good accord with experiment.…”
Section: B Cssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Our Q e agrees well with the previous result of Sohn et al 27 below 5 eV, but no other experimental data are available for comparison from 8 to 200 eV. Six theoretical approaches are available for comparison, those of Lynch et al, 31 Lee et al, 41 Bettega et al, 42,43 Gianturco and Stoecklin, 44 and Raj and Tomar, 30 as well as the present IAM-SCAR calculation. The calculation of Raj and Tomar 30 (only above 100 eV) considerably overestimates the experimental measurement.…”
Section: Anglesupporting
confidence: 91%
See 3 more Smart Citations